Suppr超能文献

[新生儿感染中Toll样受体2和4表达的变化及临床意义]

[Changes and clinical significance of Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 expression in neonatal infections].

作者信息

Zhang Jin-ping, Chen Chao, Yang Yi

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, The key laboratory of public health ministry, Shanghai 200032, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Feb;45(2):130-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Neonates are vulnerable to various infections because of their immature immune responses. Toll-like receptors could induce immune responses, both the innate and the acquired immune responses. The aim of the present study was to investigate the changes of TLR2 and TLR4 in neonatal infections, and to determine their roles in anti-infection immune reaction.

METHODS

A total of 200 infants were divided into six groups: sepsis group (n = 21), bacterial pneumonia group (n = 70), bacterial meningitis group (n = 17), urinary tract infection group (n = 38), congenital syphilis group (n = 11) and non-infection group (n = 48). The TLR mRNA was determined by RT-PCR. The protein expression of TLR and the percentage of TLR positive cells were evaluated through flow cytometric analysis.

RESULTS

  1. The TLR2 mRNA expression increased significantly in the sepsis group (6.14 +/- 0.80), most significantly in the Gram positive sepsis group (6.43 +/- 0.74). TLR2 mRNA expression was also significantly higher in the bacterial pneumonia group (5.49 +/- 0.62), the bacterial meningitis group (5.61 +/- 0.60) and the congenital syphilis group (5.89 +/- 0.38). TLR2 protein expression was the highest in the sepsis group and significantly increased in the bacterial pneumonia group, bacterial meningitis group and the congenital syphilis groups as well, all were higher than the TLR2 protein expression of the non-infectious group (1.27 +/- 0.75). The TLR2 protein expression in the Gram positive bacterial sepsis group was 2.54 +/- 0.68, that of Gram negative bacterial sepsis group was 1.25 +/- 0.51 (P < 0.05). The percentage of TLR2 positive cells in the neonatal infection group was (70.95 +/- 20.15)%, which did not differ significantly from that of non-infection group. 2. The mRNA expression of TLR4 was the highest in the sepsis group (6.20 +/- 1.59), while that in the Gram negative bacterial sepsis group was 6.78 +/- 1.79, higher than that of the Gram positive bacterial sepsis group, 5.39 +/- 0.78, (t = 2.29, P = 0.037). TLR4 mRNA expression increased significantly in the bacterial pneumonia group (5.33 +/- 1.07), the bacterial meningitis group (5.87 +/- 0.70) and the urinary tract infection group (5.38 +/- 0.91). There were no significant differences in TLR4 protein expression among these groups. The percentage of TLR4 positive cells in the neonatal infection groups was (0.71 +/- 0.31)%, higher than that of non- infection group (0.29 +/- 0.36)%. 3. In the Gram positive bacterial sepsis group, the mRNA expression of TLR2 (6.43 +/- 0.74) was higher than the mRNA expression of TLR4 (5.39 +/- 0.78), (t = 1.56, P = 0.024). In the Gram negative bacterial sepsis group, the mRNA expression of TLR4 (6.78 +/- 0.79) was significantly higher than the mRNA expression of TLR2 (5.64 +/- 0.68) (t = 2.63, P = 0.011). In the sepsis group, the TLR2 protein expression was significantly higher than the expression of TLR4 (t = 1.06, P = 0.044). The percentage of TLR4 positive cells was lower than the percentage of TLR2 positive cells among all these groups, P < 0.01. 4. Correlation analysis on gestational age and the mRNA expression, the protein expression and the percentage of TLR2 and TLR4 positive cells among all these groups did not show any statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The mRNA and the protein expression of TLR2 and the mRNA expression of TLR2 increased significantly in the studied neonatal infection groups, especially in the severe sepsis groups. The mRNA expression of TLR2 increased mainly in the Gram positive bacterial infection groups, and the mRNA expression of TLR4 increased in the Gram negative bacterial infection groups, suggesting that both the TLR2 and TLR4 signal pathway took part in the immune mechanism of neonatal infection, providing new idea and experimental basis for further understanding of immune mechanism of neonatal infection.

摘要

目的

新生儿因其免疫反应不成熟而易受各种感染。Toll样受体可诱导免疫反应,包括先天性免疫反应和获得性免疫反应。本研究的目的是探讨新生儿感染时TLR2和TLR4的变化,并确定它们在抗感染免疫反应中的作用。

方法

将200例婴儿分为六组:败血症组(n = 21)、细菌性肺炎组(n = 70)、细菌性脑膜炎组(n = 17)、尿路感染组(n = 38)、先天性梅毒组(n = 11)和非感染组(n = 48)。通过RT-PCR测定TLR mRNA。通过流式细胞术分析评估TLR的蛋白表达和TLR阳性细胞的百分比。

结果

  1. 败血症组TLR2 mRNA表达显著增加(6.14 +/- 0.80),革兰氏阳性败血症组最为显著(6.43 +/- 0.74)。细菌性肺炎组(5.49 +/- 0.62)、细菌性脑膜炎组(5.61 +/- 0.60)和先天性梅毒组(5.89 +/- 0.38)的TLR2 mRNA表达也显著升高。败血症组TLR2蛋白表达最高,细菌性肺炎组、细菌性脑膜炎组和先天性梅毒组也显著增加,并均高于非感染组的TLR2蛋白表达(1.27 +/- 0.75)。革兰氏阳性细菌性败血症组的TLR2蛋白表达为2.54 +/- 0.68,革兰氏阴性细菌性败血症组为1.25 +/- 0.51(P < 0.05)。新生儿感染组中TLR2阳性细胞的百分比为(70.95 +/- 20.15)%,与非感染组无显著差异。2. TLR4的mRNA表达在败血症组最高(6.20 +/- 1.59),而革兰氏阴性细菌性败血症组为6.78 +/- 1.79,高于革兰氏阳性细菌性败血症组的5.39 +/- 0.78(t = 2.29,P = 0.037)。细菌性肺炎组(5.33 +/- 1.07)、细菌性脑膜炎组(5.87 +/- 0.70)和尿路感染组(5.38 +/- 0.91)的TLR4 mRNA表达显著增加。这些组之间的TLR4蛋白表达无显著差异。新生儿感染组中TLR4阳性细胞的百分比为(0.71 +/- 0.31)%,高于非感染组(0.29 +/- 0.36)%。3. 在革兰氏阳性细菌性败血症组中,TLR2的mRNA表达(6.43 +/- 0.74)高于TLR4的mRNA表达(5.39 +/- 0.78)(t = 1.56,P = 0.024)。在革兰氏阴性细菌性败血症组中,TLR4的mRNA表达(6.78 +/- 0.79)显著高于TLR2的mRNA表达(5.64 +/- 0.68)(t = 2.63,P = 0.011)。在败血症组中,TLR2蛋白表达显著高于TLR4的表达(t = 1.06,P = 0.044)。所有这些组中TLR4阳性细胞的百分比低于TLR2阳性细胞的百分比,P < 0.01。4. 对胎龄与所有这些组中TLR2和TLR4阳性细胞的mRNA表达、蛋白表达及百分比进行相关性分析,未显示任何统计学意义。

结论

在所研究的新生儿感染组中,尤其是严重败血症组,TLR2的mRNA和蛋白表达以及TLR4的mRNA表达显著增加。TLR2的mRNA表达主要在革兰氏阳性细菌感染组中增加,TLR4的mRNA表达在革兰氏阴性细菌感染组中增加,提示TLR2和TLR4信号通路均参与了新生儿感染的免疫机制,为进一步了解新生儿感染的免疫机制提供了新的思路和实验依据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验