Malmström Johan, Adolfsson Erik, Emanuelsson Lena, Thomsen Peter
Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Box 412, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Sep;19(9):2983-92. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3045-2. Epub 2007 May 5.
The role of the material composition, porosity and surface topography of scaffolds for promotion of osteogenesis and osseointegration is not fully understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of material composition and surface topography on bone ingrowth and bone contact. Designed macroporous ceramic scaffolds of zirconia and hydroxyapatite were used. Using free form fabrication (FFF) techniques an identical macroporosity in both materials was achieved. The scaffolds were implanted in rabbit tibia (cortical bone) and femur (trabecular bone). After 6 weeks of implantation the tissue response was assessed with histology and histomorphometry. The results showed significantly more bone ingrowth and bone contact in the hydroxyapatite scaffolds compared to the zirconia scaffold. Surface topography had no significant effect on bone contact inside the macropores regardless of material. This was observed in both cortical and trabecular bone sites. The study suggests that the difference between hydroxyapatite and zirconia was due to a difference in material chemistry.
支架材料的组成、孔隙率和表面形貌对促进骨生成和骨整合的作用尚未完全明确。本研究的目的是评估材料组成和表面形貌对骨长入和骨接触的影响。使用了设计好的氧化锆和羟基磷灰石大孔陶瓷支架。采用自由成型制造(FFF)技术使两种材料具有相同的大孔隙率。将支架植入兔胫骨(皮质骨)和股骨(松质骨)。植入6周后,通过组织学和组织形态计量学评估组织反应。结果显示,与氧化锆支架相比,羟基磷灰石支架中的骨长入和骨接触明显更多。无论材料如何,表面形貌对大孔内的骨接触均无显著影响。在皮质骨和松质骨部位均观察到这一现象。该研究表明,羟基磷灰石和氧化锆之间的差异归因于材料化学的不同。