Winkelman Warren J, Halifax Nancy V Davis
Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
J Med Syst. 2007 Apr;31(2):131-9. doi: 10.1007/s10916-006-9048-6.
We present an institutional ethnography of hospital-based psoriasis day treatment in the context of evaluating readiness to supplement services and support with a new web site. Through observation, interviews and a critical consideration of documents, forms and other textually-mediated discourses in the day-to-day work of nurses and physicians, we come to understand how the historical gender-determined power structure of nurses and physicians impacts nurses' work. On the one hand, nurses' work can have certain social benefits that would usually be considered untenable in traditional healthcare: nurses as primary decision-makers, nurses as experts in the treatment of disease, physicians as secondary consultants, and patients as co-facilitators in care delivery processes. However, benefits seem to have come at the nurses' expense, as they are required to maintain a cloak of invisibility for themselves and for their workplace, so that the Centre appears like all other outpatient clinics, and the nurses do not enjoy appropriate economic recognition. Implications for this negotiated invisibility on the implementation of new information systems in healthcare are discussed.
在评估是否准备好通过一个新网站来补充服务和支持的背景下,我们展示了一项关于医院银屑病日间治疗的机构人种志研究。通过观察、访谈以及对护士和医生日常工作中的文件、表格及其他文本介导话语的批判性思考,我们开始理解护士和医生由历史性别决定的权力结构如何影响护士的工作。一方面,护士的工作可以带来某些社会效益,而这些效益在传统医疗保健中通常被认为是难以维持的:护士作为主要决策者,护士作为疾病治疗专家,医生作为次要顾问,以及患者作为护理过程中的共同促进者。然而,这些好处似乎是以护士为代价的,因为他们被要求对自己和工作场所保持隐形,以便该中心看起来与其他所有门诊诊所一样,而且护士没有得到适当的经济认可。本文讨论了这种协商后的隐形对医疗保健中新信息系统实施的影响。