Suppr超能文献

图像质量的主观和客观评估——一项比较

Subjective and objective assessment of image quality--a comparison.

作者信息

Good W F, Gur D, Feist J H, Thaete F L, Fuhrman C R, Britton C A, Slasky B S

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261-0001.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 1994 May;7(2):77-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03168426.

Abstract

Forced-choice just noticeable difference (JND) studies are extremely sensitive to image quality variations that are below the threshold at which the differences are apparent to or definable by the observer. Paired comparisons of 4K and 2K laser-printed posteroanterior chest images consistently demonstrated that although images are viewed as comparable by radiologists, when forced to choose the better ("sharper") image, they actually select the higher-resolution images in 83% of the paired observations. We conclude that small differences in image quality may be detectable even in image sets which are considered to be comparable by subjective assessments.

摘要

强制选择恰可察觉差异(JND)研究对图像质量变化极为敏感,这些变化低于观察者能够明显察觉或定义差异的阈值。对4K和2K激光打印的后前位胸部图像进行配对比较,结果始终表明,尽管放射科医生认为这些图像具有可比性,但当被迫选择更好(“更清晰”)的图像时,他们实际上在83%的配对观察中选择了更高分辨率的图像。我们得出结论,即使在主观评估认为具有可比性的图像集中,图像质量的微小差异也可能被检测到。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验