Prokop M, Schaefer C M, Oestmann J W, Galanski M
Department of Diagnostic Radiology I, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
Radiology. 1993 May;187(2):521-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475301.
Observer performance with four unsharp mask filtering algorithms for storage phosphor chest radiographs was compared with that with conventional screen-film radiographs in the detection of three types of simulated lung disease: nodules, fine lines, and micronodule clusters. Previously studied parameter sets (small [1.4-mm] and medium [5-mm] filter masks) and two new parameter sets (large [2.5-cm] and ultralarge [7-cm] masks) were compared by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis. With medium and small masks, nodule detection was inferior to that achieved with other modes. Use of ultralarge masks decreased the detection of lines compared with detection with conventional screen-film radiographs. Although detection of micronodule clusters was worse with digital images than with conventional screen-film radiographs, results with large and ultralarge masks were better than with small masks. Overall, filtering with large masks was best suited for simultaneously matching linear, nodular, and micronodular structures. These results suggest that lesion-specific processing of digital chest images is not necessary.
在检测三种模拟肺部疾病(结节、细线和微结节群)时,将四种用于存储磷光体胸部X光片的锐化掩膜滤波算法的观察者表现与传统屏-片X光片的观察者表现进行了比较。通过接受者操作特征分析,对先前研究的参数集(小[1.4毫米]和中[5毫米]滤波掩膜)以及两个新的参数集(大[2.5厘米]和超大[7厘米]掩膜)进行了比较。使用中、小掩膜时,结节检测效果不如其他模式。与传统屏-片X光片检测相比,使用超大掩膜降低了细线的检测率。尽管数字图像对微结节群的检测比传统屏-片X光片差,但大掩膜和超大掩膜的检测结果优于小掩膜。总体而言,大掩膜滤波最适合同时匹配线性、结节状和微结节状结构。这些结果表明,对数字胸部图像进行病变特异性处理并非必要。