Iliev Milko E, Meyenberg Alexander, Buerki Ernst, Shafranov George, Shields M Bruce
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bern, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;91(10):1364-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.120980. Epub 2007 May 10.
Several conversion tables and formulas have been suggested to correct applanation intraocular pressure (IOP) for central corneal thickness (CCT). CCT is also thought to represent an independent glaucoma risk factor. In an attempt to integrate IOP and CCT into a unified risk factor and avoid uncertain correction for tonometric inaccuracy, a new pressure-to-cornea index (PCI) is proposed.
PCI (IOP/CCT(3)) was defined as the ratio between untreated IOP and CCT(3) in mm (ultrasound pachymetry). PCI distribution in 220 normal controls, 53 patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 76 with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 89 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was investigated. PCI's ability to discriminate between glaucoma (NTG+POAG) and non-glaucoma (controls+OHT) was compared with that of three published formulae for correcting IOP for CCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built.
Mean PCI values were: Controls 92.0 (SD 24.8), NTG 129.1 (SD 25.8), OHT 134.0 (SD 26.5), POAG 173.6 (SD 40.9). To minimise IOP bias, eyes within the same 2 mm Hg range between 16 and 29 mm Hg (16-17, 18-19, etc) were separately compared: control and NTG eyes as well as OHT and POAG eyes differed significantly. PCI demonstrated a larger area under the ROC curve (AUC) and significantly higher sensitivity at fixed 80% and 90% specificities compared with each of the correction formulas; optimum PCI cut-off value 133.8.
A PCI range of 120-140 is proposed as the upper limit of "normality", 120 being the cut-off value for eyes with untreated pressures <or=21 mm Hg, 140 when untreated pressure >or=22 mm Hg. PCI may reflect individual susceptibility to a given IOP level, and thus represent a glaucoma risk factor. Longitudinal studies are needed to prove its prognostic value.
已经提出了几种转换表和公式来根据中央角膜厚度(CCT)校正压平眼压(IOP)。CCT也被认为是一个独立的青光眼危险因素。为了将IOP和CCT整合为一个统一的危险因素,并避免因眼压测量不准确而进行不确定的校正,提出了一种新的眼压与角膜指数(PCI)。
PCI(IOP/CCT³)被定义为未治疗的IOP与以毫米为单位的CCT³(超声测厚法)之间的比值。研究了220名正常对照者、53名正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)患者、76名高眼压症(OHT)患者和89名原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者的PCI分布情况。将PCI区分青光眼(NTG+POAG)和非青光眼(对照者+OHT)的能力与已发表的三种根据CCT校正IOP的公式进行了比较。构建了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。
PCI的平均值分别为:正常对照者92.0(标准差24.8),NTG患者129.1(标准差25.8),OHT患者134.0(标准差26.5),POAG患者173.6(标准差40.9)。为了尽量减少IOP偏差,对眼压在16至29 mmHg之间同一2 mmHg范围内的眼睛(16 - 17、18 - 19等)进行了单独比较:正常对照者和NTG患者的眼睛以及OHT患者和POAG患者的眼睛存在显著差异。与每个校正公式相比,PCI在ROC曲线下的面积(AUC)更大,在固定的80%和90%特异性时灵敏度显著更高;最佳PCI临界值为133.8。
建议将120 - 140的PCI范围作为“正常”上限,对于未治疗眼压≤21 mmHg的眼睛,临界值为120;对于未治疗眼压≥22 mmHg的眼睛,临界值为140。PCI可能反映个体对给定IOP水平的易感性,因此代表一种青光眼危险因素。需要进行纵向研究以证明其预后价值。