Kording Konrad P, Tenenbaum Joshua B, Shadmehr Reza
Physiology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 446 E. Ontario Street, Rm 922, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jun;10(6):779-86. doi: 10.1038/nn1901. Epub 2007 May 13.
There are many causes for variation in the responses of the motor apparatus to neural commands. Fast-timescale disturbances occur when muscles fatigue. Slow-timescale disturbances occur when muscles are damaged or when limb dynamics change as a result of development. To maintain performance, motor commands need to adapt. Computing the best adaptation in response to any performance error results in a credit assignment problem: which timescale is responsible for this disturbance? Here we show that a Bayesian solution to this problem accounts for numerous behaviors of animals during both short- and long-term training. Our analysis focused on characteristics of the oculomotor system during learning, including the effects of time passage. However, we suggest that learning and memory in other paradigms, such as reach adaptation, adaptation of visual neurons and retrieval of declarative memories, largely follow similar rules.
运动装置对神经指令的反应存在多种变化原因。当肌肉疲劳时会出现快速时间尺度的干扰。当肌肉受损或由于发育导致肢体动力学发生变化时会出现缓慢时间尺度的干扰。为了维持表现,运动指令需要进行调整。计算针对任何表现误差的最佳调整会导致一个信用分配问题:哪个时间尺度对这种干扰负责?在这里,我们表明这个问题的贝叶斯解决方案解释了动物在短期和长期训练期间的众多行为。我们的分析集中在学习过程中动眼系统的特征,包括时间推移的影响。然而,我们认为其他范式中的学习和记忆,如伸手适应、视觉神经元的适应和陈述性记忆的检索,在很大程度上遵循类似的规则。