Guo Chunyan, Lawson Adam L, Zhang Qin, Jiang Yang
Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Apr;29(4):441-52. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20409.
We investigated brain responses to matching versus nonmatching objects in working memory (WM) with a modified delayed match-to-sample task using event-related potentials (ERPs). In addition, ERP correlates of new items (new matches/new nonmatches) and previously studied items (studied matches/studied nonmatches) were examined in the WM task. Half of the common visual objects were initially studied until 95% accuracy was attained and half were new. Each memory trial began with the presentation of a sample object followed by nine test objects. Participants indicated whether each test item was the same as the object held in mind (i.e., match) or a nonmatch. Compared to studied matches, new matches evoked activity that was 50 ms earlier and largest at frontal sites. In contrast, P3 activity associated with studied nonmatches was larger than for new nonmatches at mostly posterior sites, which parallels previously reported old-new ERP effects. The ERP source analysis further confirms that the cortical mechanisms underlying matching objects and rejecting irrelevant objects during the task are both temporally and spatially distinct. Moreover, our current findings suggest that prior learning affects brain responses to matching visual items during a WM task.
我们使用事件相关电位(ERP),通过改良的延迟样本匹配任务,研究了工作记忆(WM)中大脑对匹配与不匹配物体的反应。此外,在WM任务中,还检查了新项目(新匹配/新不匹配)和先前研究项目(研究过的匹配/研究过的不匹配)的ERP相关性。一半常见视觉物体最初进行研究,直至达到95%的准确率,另一半是新的。每个记忆试验开始时呈现一个样本物体,随后是九个测试物体。参与者指出每个测试项目是否与脑海中记住的物体相同(即匹配)或不匹配。与研究过的匹配相比,新匹配引发的活动早50毫秒,且在额叶部位最大。相反,在大多数后部部位,与研究过的不匹配相关的P3活动大于新不匹配,这与先前报道的新旧ERP效应相似。ERP源分析进一步证实,任务期间匹配物体和拒绝无关物体的皮层机制在时间和空间上都是不同的。此外,我们目前的研究结果表明,先前的学习会影响WM任务期间大脑对匹配视觉项目的反应。