van Egmond Hans P, Schothorst Ronald C, Jonker Marco A
Laboratory for Food and Residue Analysis, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007 Sep;389(1):147-57. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1317-9. Epub 2007 May 17.
Regulations relating to mycotoxins have been established in many countries to protect the consumer from the harmful effects of these compounds. Different factors play a role in the decision-making process of setting limits for mycotoxins. These include scientific factors, for example the availability of toxicological data and occurrence data, detailed knowledge about possibilities for sampling and analysis, and socio-economic issues. By the end of 2003, approximately 100 countries (covering approximately 85% of the world's inhabitants) had specific regulations or detailed guidelines for mycotoxins in food. The regulations were related to aflatoxins (B(1), B(2), G(1) and G(2)), aflatoxin M(1), trichothecenes (deoxynivalenol, diacetoxyscirpenol, T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin), fumonisins (B(1), B(2), and B(3)), agaric acid, ergot alkaloids, ochratoxin A, patulin, phomopsins, sterigmatocystin, and zearalenone. In Europe, and in particular in the EU, regulatory and scientific interest in mycotoxins has undergone a development in the last decade from autonomous national activity towards more EU-driven activity with a structural and network character. Harmonized EU limits now exist for 40 mycotoxin-food combinations. It is expected this number will grow in 2007 to approximately 50. The direct or indirect influence of European organizations and programs on the EU mycotoxin regulatory developments is significant. They include the European Food Safety Authority, the Scientific Cooperation on Questions relating to Food, the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed, the creation of an EU Community Reference Laboratory for Mycotoxins and a mandate of the EC to the European Standardization Committee in methods for analysis for mycotoxins in food. Large pan-European research and networking projects as "BioCop" and "MoniQA" are also important.
许多国家已制定了与霉菌毒素相关的法规,以保护消费者免受这些化合物的有害影响。不同因素在设定霉菌毒素限量的决策过程中发挥作用。这些因素包括科学因素,例如毒理学数据和发生率数据的可用性、关于采样和分析可能性的详细知识,以及社会经济问题。到2003年底,约100个国家(覆盖世界约85%的人口)针对食品中的霉菌毒素制定了具体法规或详细指南。这些法规涉及黄曲霉毒素(B(1)、B(2)、G(1)和G(2))、黄曲霉毒素M(1)、单端孢霉烯族毒素(脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇、二醋酸藨草镰刀菌烯醇、T-2毒素和HT-2毒素)、伏马菌素(B(1)、B(2)和B(3))、木耳酸、麦角生物碱、赭曲霉毒素A、展青霉素、拟茎点霉毒素、杂色曲霉素和玉米赤霉烯酮。在欧洲,特别是在欧盟,过去十年中对霉菌毒素的监管和科学关注已从自主的国家活动发展为更具欧盟驱动性质、具有结构性和网络化特征的活动。目前欧盟已对40种霉菌毒素-食品组合制定了统一限量。预计2007年这一数字将增至约50种。欧洲各组织和项目对欧盟霉菌毒素监管发展的直接或间接影响很大。其中包括欧洲食品安全局、食品相关问题科学合作组织、食品和饲料快速预警系统、设立欧盟霉菌毒素共同体参考实验室以及欧盟委员会赋予欧洲标准化委员会食品中霉菌毒素分析方法的任务授权。大型泛欧研究和网络项目如“BioCop”和“MoniQA”也很重要。