Suppr超能文献

孕早期负压吸宫术前的宫颈准备:吉美前列素与米非司酮(RU 486)的随机对照比较

Pre-operative cervical preparation before first trimester vacuum aspiration: a randomized controlled comparison between gemeprost and mifepristone (RU 486).

作者信息

Henshaw R C, Templeton A A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Oct;98(10):1025-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb15341.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of 200 mg mifepristone with 1 mg gemeprost vaginal pessary in achieving cervical dilatation and softening ('priming') before late first trimester pregnancy vacuum aspiration.

DESIGN

A randomized, operator blind, placebo controlled trial.

SETTING

UK teaching hospital.

SUBJECTS

90 primigravid women with 63-91 days amenorrhoea and ultrasonically confirmed single living fetus of correct size for gestational age.

INTERVENTIONS

The women were allocated to receive 200 mg mifepristone orally or an identical oral placebo 36 h before operation or 1 mg gemeprost vaginal pessary 3-4 h preoperatively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Onset of new symptoms following drug administration, a proven objective measure of the force required to dilate the cervix, and estimated intraoperative blood loss.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the baseline cervical dilatation, the force required to dilate the cervix or the volume of intraoperative blood loss between the active treatment groups. Both drugs were significantly more effective than placebo. Significantly fewer women in the mifepristone group had adverse side effects than in the gemeprost group.

CONCLUSIONS

Mifepristone is a highly effective cervical priming agent, and has the advantages of being an oral preparation associated with few side effects.

摘要

目的

比较200毫克米非司酮与1毫克吉美前列素阴道栓剂在孕早期妊娠负压吸引术前使宫颈扩张和软化(“预处理”)的效果。

设计

一项随机、术者盲法、安慰剂对照试验。

地点

英国教学医院。

研究对象

90名初孕妇,停经63 - 91天,超声确认单活胎,胎儿大小与孕周相符。

干预措施

将这些妇女分为三组,分别在手术前36小时口服200毫克米非司酮或相同的口服安慰剂;或在术前3 - 4小时使用1毫克吉美前列素阴道栓剂。

主要观察指标

给药后新症状出现情况、测量宫颈扩张所需力量的客观指标以及估计术中失血量。

结果

活性治疗组之间在基线宫颈扩张、宫颈扩张所需力量或术中失血量方面无显著差异,但两种药物均比安慰剂显著有效。米非司酮组出现不良副作用的女性明显少于吉美前列素组

结论

米非司酮是一种高效宫颈预处理药物,具有口服制剂且副作用少的优点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验