McMaster Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Centre for Mountain Health Services, J Wing, 100 West 5th St., Hamilton, ON, L8N 3K7, Canada.
Community Ment Health J. 2010 Aug;46(4):342-50. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9275-7. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
There has been increasing commentary about the degree to which Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams provide recovery-oriented services, often centered around the question of the use of coercion. The present study was designed to contribute to this discussion through an examination of recovery-oriented service provision and ACT fidelity among 67 teams in the province of Ontario, Canada. The findings indicated a moderate to high degree of recovery orientation in service provision, with no significant relationship between ACT fidelity and consumer and family/key support ratings of recovery orientation. A significant relationship was found, however, between the 'nature of services' domain of the Dartmouth Assertive Community Treatment Scale (DACTS) and ratings of recovery orientation provided by staff and ACT coordinators. These findings extend the existing dialogue regarding the evaluation of ACT intervention process factors and indicate that current measures of fidelity may not be adequately addressing dimensions of recovery-oriented service provision.
越来越多的人在评论,倡导式社区治疗 (ACT) 团队在多大程度上提供以康复为导向的服务,而这通常集中在使用强制手段的问题上。本研究旨在通过对加拿大安大略省 67 个团队的以康复为导向的服务提供和 ACT 保真度的检查,为这一讨论做出贡献。研究结果表明,在服务提供方面,康复取向的程度从中等到高度不等,而 ACT 保真度与消费者和家庭/关键支持人员对康复取向的评价之间没有显著关系。然而,在达特茅斯倡导式社区治疗量表 (DACTS) 的“服务性质”领域和工作人员以及 ACT 协调员提供的康复取向评价之间发现了显著的关系。这些发现扩展了关于 ACT 干预过程因素评估的现有对话,并表明当前的保真度衡量标准可能没有充分解决以康复为导向的服务提供的各个方面。