Marret E, Remy C, Bonnet F
Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Br J Surg. 2007 Jun;94(6):665-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5825.
Epidural analgesia (EA) with local anaesthetic is considered to play a key role after colorectal surgery. However, its effect on postoperative recovery is still a matter of debate.
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing postoperative EA and parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery was performed. The effect on postoperative recovery was evaluated in terms of length of hospital stay, pain intensity, duration of postoperative ileus, incidence of postoperative complications and side-effects.
Sixteen trials published between 1987 and 2005 were included. EA significantly reduced pain scores and duration of ileus (weighted mean difference - 1.55 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) - 2.27 to - 0.84) days). On the other hand, it was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of pruritus (odds ratio (OR) 4.8 (95 per cent c.i. 1.3 to 17.0)), urinary retention (OR 4.3 (1.2 to 15.9)) and arterial hypotension (OR 13.5 (4.0 to 57.7)). EA did not influence duration of hospital stay.
Despite improved analgesia and a decrease in ileus, EA has some adverse effects and does not shorten the duration of hospital stay after colorectal surgery.
局部麻醉的硬膜外镇痛(EA)被认为在结直肠手术后起着关键作用。然而,其对术后恢复的影响仍存在争议。
对比较结直肠手术后EA与胃肠外阿片类镇痛的随机对照试验进行系统评价。从住院时间、疼痛强度、术后肠梗阻持续时间、术后并发症发生率和副作用方面评估对术后恢复的影响。
纳入了1987年至2005年间发表的16项试验。EA显著降低了疼痛评分和肠梗阻持续时间(加权平均差-1.55(95%置信区间(c.i.)-2.27至-0.84)天)。另一方面,它与瘙痒发生率(优势比(OR)4.8(95% c.i. 1.3至17.0))、尿潴留(OR 4.3(1.2至15.9))和动脉低血压(OR 13.5(4.0至57.7))的显著增加相关。EA不影响住院时间。
尽管镇痛效果改善且肠梗阻减少,但EA有一些不良反应,且不能缩短结直肠手术后的住院时间。