Forger Daniel, Gonze Didier, Virshup David, Welsh David K
Mathematical Biology Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Center for Computational Medicine and Biology, and Center for Sleep Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
J Biol Rhythms. 2007 Jun;22(3):200-10. doi: 10.1177/0748730407301823.
Two major approaches have been used to model circadian clocks. Qualitative modeling, used prior to the recent wealth of detailed molecular knowledge, makes general predictions but cannot provide detailed mechanistic insights. The more recent biophysical approach, on the other hand, incorporates the biochemical events that drive the clock and can make detailed and testable molecular predictions. These predictions are being tested using new experimental techniques that measure reaction kinetics and the behavior of individual cells. A joint modeling and experimental approach has recently been used to understand how mutations affecting phosphorylation can lead to a short circadian period in tau mutant hamsters and in humans with familial advanced sleep phase syndrome (FASPS). Another recent study has revealed novel single-cell phenotypes of clock gene mutations, demanding revision of current biophysical models yet validating certain model predictions that were previously overlooked. A new paradigm for clock research is emerging in which modeling inspires new experimental efforts, experimental data inspire new modeling efforts, and joint modeling/experimental studies lead to a deeper understanding of mammalian circadian rhythms.
有两种主要方法用于构建昼夜节律时钟模型。定性建模在近期获得大量详细分子知识之前就已使用,它能做出一般性预测,但无法提供详细的机制性见解。另一方面,较新的生物物理方法纳入了驱动时钟的生化事件,能够做出详细且可检验的分子预测。这些预测正通过测量反应动力学和单个细胞行为的新实验技术进行检验。最近,一种联合建模与实验的方法被用于理解影响磷酸化的突变如何导致tau突变仓鼠和患有家族性晚期睡眠相位综合征(FASPS)的人类出现较短的昼夜节律周期。另一项近期研究揭示了时钟基因突变的新型单细胞表型,这要求对当前的生物物理模型进行修订,但同时也验证了某些之前被忽视的模型预测。一种新的时钟研究范式正在兴起,即建模激发新的实验工作,实验数据激发新的建模工作,而联合建模/实验研究则能更深入地理解哺乳动物的昼夜节律。