Magnusson Roger S
University of Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
Global Health. 2007 May 22;3:2. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-3-2.
This paper assesses progress in the development of a global framework for responding to non-communicable diseases, as reflected in the policies and initiatives of the World Health Organization (WHO), World Bank and the UN: the institutions most capable of shaping a coherent global policy. Responding to the global burden of chronic disease requires a strategic assessment of the global processes that are likely to be most effective in generating commitment to policy change at country level, and in influencing industry behaviour. WHO has adopted a legal process with tobacco (the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control), but a non-legal, advocacy-based approach with diet and physical activity (the Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health). The paper assesses the merits of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and the FCTC as distinct global processes for advancing health development, before considering what lessons might be learned for enhancing the implementation of the Global Strategy on Diet. While global partnerships, economic incentives, and international legal instruments could each contribute to a more effective global response to chronic diseases, the paper makes a special case for the development of international legal standards in select areas of diet and nutrition, as a strategy for ensuring that the health of future generations does not become dependent on corporate charity and voluntary commitments. A broader frame of reference for lifestyle-related chronic diseases is needed: one that draws together WHO's work in tobacco, nutrition and physical activity, and that envisages selective use of international legal obligations, non-binding recommendations, advocacy and policy advice as tools of choice for promoting different elements of the strategy.
本文评估了应对非传染性疾病全球框架的发展进展,这一进展体现在世界卫生组织(WHO)、世界银行和联合国的政策及倡议中,这些机构最有能力制定连贯一致的全球政策。应对全球慢性病负担需要对全球进程进行战略评估,这些进程在促使各国对政策变革作出承诺以及影响行业行为方面可能最为有效。世卫组织针对烟草采用了法律程序(《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约》),但针对饮食和身体活动采用了非法律的、基于倡导的方法(《饮食、身体活动与健康全球战略》)。在考虑可以吸取哪些经验教训以加强《饮食全球战略》的实施之前,本文评估了千年发展目标(MDGs)和《烟草控制框架公约》作为促进健康发展的不同全球进程的优点。虽然全球伙伴关系、经济激励措施和国际法律文书都可以为更有效地全球应对慢性病作出贡献,但本文特别主张在饮食和营养的特定领域制定国际法律标准,作为确保子孙后代的健康不依赖企业慈善和自愿承诺的一项战略。需要一个与生活方式相关的慢性病更广泛的参照框架:一个整合世卫组织在烟草、营养和身体活动方面工作的框架,并且设想有选择地利用国际法律义务、不具约束力的建议、倡导和政策建议作为促进该战略不同要素的首选工具。