Grooten Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas, Mulder Marie, Wiktorin Christina
Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Work. 2007;28(4):313-23.
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of two types of ergonomic intervention on pain and pain-related disability in the neck/shoulder and low back regions. A cohort of 492 subjects of various occupations with non-specific neck/shoulder or low back pain was followed over a five to six year period. The study subjects were classified into four intervention groups: no ergonomic intervention, educational worksite intervention, workplace intervention, and combined workplace and educational worksite intervention. The group with no ergonomic intervention was used as the reference group. The changes in pain intensity and pain-related disability from baseline to follow-up in each of the three groups with intervention were compared to the changes in the reference group. During the follow-up, 39% of the subjects had received ergonomic intervention. The average change in pain intensity and pain-related disability was smaller in the educational worksite intervention group than in the reference group. The average reduction of pain intensity and pain-related disability did not differ between the two other intervention groups and the reference group. Thus, for subjects still at work, ergonomic intervention seemed to be ineffective for reducing neck/shoulder and low back pain and pain-related disability.
本研究的目的是检验两种工效学干预措施对颈部/肩部和下背部疼痛及与疼痛相关的功能障碍的影响。对492名患有非特异性颈部/肩部或下背部疼痛的不同职业受试者进行了为期五到六年的跟踪研究。研究对象被分为四个干预组:无工效学干预组、教育性工作场所干预组、工作场所干预组以及工作场所与教育性工作场所联合干预组。无工效学干预组用作参照组。将三个干预组从基线到随访期间疼痛强度和与疼痛相关的功能障碍的变化与参照组的变化进行比较。在随访期间,39%的受试者接受了工效学干预。教育性工作场所干预组疼痛强度和与疼痛相关的功能障碍的平均变化小于参照组。其他两个干预组与参照组在疼痛强度和与疼痛相关的功能障碍的平均降低幅度上没有差异。因此,对于仍在工作的受试者,工效学干预似乎对减轻颈部/肩部和下背部疼痛及与疼痛相关的功能障碍无效。