Suppr超能文献

使用调整节拍连续加法测试(Adjusting-PSAT)和信息处理计算机化测试(CTIP)对练习在信息处理速度方面的影响。

The effects of practice on speed of information processing using the Adjusting-Paced Serial Addition Test (Adjusting-PSAT) and the Computerized Tests of Information Processing (CTIP).

作者信息

Baird B J, Tombaugh Thomas N, Francis M

机构信息

Psychology Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Appl Neuropsychol. 2007;14(2):88-100. doi: 10.1080/09084280701319912.

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to determine the effects of practice on the Adjusting-Paced Serial Addition Task (Adjusting-PSAT) (Tombaugh, 1999) and the Computerized Tests of Information Processing (CTIP) (Tombaugh & Rees, 2000). The Adjusting-PSAT is a computerized modification of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) (Gronwall, 1977) that makes the interval between digits contingent on the correctness of the response. This titration procedure permits a threshold value to be derived that represents the shortest presentation interval in which a person can process the digits to produce the correct sum. The CTIP consists of three reaction time tests that are progressively more difficult. Results showed that robust practice effects occurred with the Adjusting-PSAT, with the greatest increase in performance occurring on the first retest trial. Practice effects were equally prominent regardless of whether the first retest trial occurred 20A min, 1 week, or 3 months after the first administration. These gains were maintained for periods up to 6 months and were independent of modality of presentation (visual or auditory) and type of number list (easy or hard). In contrast to the findings with the Adjusting-PSAT, only minimal practice effects were observed with the CTIP. The major clinical implication of the study is that the high reliability coefficients for the CTIP, the lack of anxiety associated with its administration, and its insensitivity to variables such as numerical and verbal ability make the CTIP ideally suited for the serial evaluation of cognitive status. These characteristics also make the CTIP a viable alternative to the Adjusting-PSAT or PASAT for measuring speed of information processing. If the Adjusting-PSAT is administered repeatedly in clinical evaluations, a "dual baseline" or "run in" procedure should be used, with the second administration serving as the baseline measurement.

摘要

进行了三项实验,以确定练习对调整节奏的串行加法任务(Adjusting-PSAT)(汤博,1999年)和信息处理计算机化测试(CTIP)(汤博和里斯,2000年)的影响。Adjusting-PSAT是对节奏听觉串行加法测试(PASAT)(格伦沃尔,1977年)的计算机化修改,它使数字之间的间隔取决于反应的正确性。这种滴定程序允许得出一个阈值,该阈值代表一个人能够处理数字以得出正确总和的最短呈现间隔。CTIP由三个反应时间测试组成,难度逐渐增加。结果表明,Adjusting-PSAT出现了显著的练习效果,在首次重新测试时表现提升最大。无论首次重新测试是在首次测试后20分钟、1周还是3个月进行,练习效果都同样显著。这些提升在长达6个月的时间内得以保持,并且与呈现方式(视觉或听觉)和数字列表类型(简单或困难)无关。与Adjusting-PSAT的研究结果相反,CTIP仅观察到最小的练习效果。该研究的主要临床意义在于,CTIP的高可靠性系数、与测试实施相关的焦虑缺乏以及对诸如数字和语言能力等变量的不敏感性,使其非常适合用于认知状态的系列评估。这些特性也使CTIP成为测量信息处理速度时替代Adjusting-PSAT或PASAT的可行选择。如果在临床评估中反复进行Adjusting-PSAT测试,应采用“双重基线”或“预测试”程序,将第二次测试作为基线测量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验