Suppr超能文献

用户参与研究申请的制定:障碍、促进因素及影响

User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts.

作者信息

Staniszewska Sophie, Jones Nicola, Newburn Mary, Marshall Shanit

机构信息

RCN Institute, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2007 Jun;10(2):173-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00436.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To involve users in the development of a research bid to examine parents' experiences of having a pre-term baby, and to examine the barriers, enablers and impacts of user involvement.

DESIGN

A mainly collaborative approach to user involvement was adopted, although different types of involvement were evident at different stages of the project. Users' experiences and perspectives provided the focus for the regular meetings which underpinned the writing of the research bid. The researcher acted as a facilitator in the development of the bid, with input from users and the wider advisory group.

MAIN OUTCOMES

User involvement had an important impact on the development of the research aims, methods and on ethical aspects. Through careful collaboration a research bid was produced which was rooted in users' experiences, whilst also addressing key research questions. Key enablers for involvement included good working relationships, funding for the lead researchers time. Barriers included lack of financial support for users, the time-consuming nature of involvement and the language of research.

CONCLUSIONS

If user involvement remains an international policy imperative with little if any support at the vital stage of bid development, policy-makers, service user organizations, researchers, health service providers and commissioners will need to recognize the limited nature of involvement that may result and the impact this would have on the evidence base. Researchers will need to recognize the resource implications of involvement at this point, and user groups will need to decide whether to participate when there is the greatest chance of influencing research but little or no funding.

摘要

目的

让用户参与一项研究标书的制定,该研究旨在调查父母生育早产儿的经历,并探究用户参与的障碍、促进因素及影响。

设计

采用了一种主要为协作式的用户参与方法,不过在项目的不同阶段,不同类型的参与方式也很明显。用户的经历和观点为定期会议提供了重点内容,这些会议为研究标书的撰写奠定了基础。在标书制定过程中,研究人员担任协调人,吸收用户及更广泛咨询小组的意见。

主要结果

用户参与对研究目标、方法以及伦理方面的发展产生了重要影响。通过精心协作,制定出了一份基于用户经历且同时解决关键研究问题的研究标书。参与的关键促进因素包括良好的工作关系、为首席研究人员提供时间方面的资金支持。障碍包括缺乏对用户的资金支持、参与过程耗时以及研究语言问题。

结论

如果用户参与仍是一项国际政策要求,但在标书制定这一关键阶段几乎得不到任何支持,那么政策制定者、服务用户组织、研究人员、医疗服务提供者和委托方将需要认识到可能导致的参与的有限性以及这对证据基础的影响。研究人员此时需要认识到参与所涉及的资源问题,而用户群体则需要在最有可能影响研究但资金很少或没有资金的情况下决定是否参与。

相似文献

1
User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts.
Health Expect. 2007 Jun;10(2):173-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00436.x.
3
Interprofessional learning in primary care: an exploration of the service user experience leads to a new model for co-learning.
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan;35(1):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 29.
4
Lone voices have an emotional content: focussing on mental health service user and carer involvement.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(2):164-77. doi: 10.1108/09526861111105112.
7
Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of evidence and practice.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Feb;45(2):298-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.09.010. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
10
Mental health service users' experiences of mental health care: an integrative literature review.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Apr;22(3):171-82. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12202. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

4
How do trial teams plan for retention during the design stage of the trial? A scoping review.
Trials. 2023 Dec 4;24(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07775-2.
6
Developing a research community within an online healthcare feedback platform.
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):705-714. doi: 10.1111/hex.13696. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
7
8
Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Participation in Prioritization of Research Questions in Pediatric Hospital Medicine.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e229085. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9085.
9
Involving and engaging pregnant women in maternity-related research: reflections on an innovative approach.
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Dec 16;7(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00332-8.

本文引用的文献

1
A pilot study of therapeutic massage for people with Parkinson's disease: the added value of user involvement.
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005 Aug;11(3):161-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2004.12.008.
2
The impact of service user involvement in research.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2005;18(2-3):103-12. doi: 10.1108/09526860510588133.
3
Involving older people in research: methodological issues.
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 May;13(3):268-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00560.x.
4
Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research - a framework for future development and understanding.
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Mar;14 Suppl 1:48-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01162.x.
5
Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded.
Health Policy. 2004 Dec;70(3):281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.04.004.
6
Involving users in low back pain research.
Health Expect. 2003 Dec;6(4):332-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-7625.2003.00230.x.
8
From passive subjects to equal partners: qualitative review of user involvement in research.
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;181:468-72. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.6.468.
9
Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: a pilot project.
Health Expect. 2001 Mar;4(1):18-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00113.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验