• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强服务使用者和护理者参与研究的能力:最佳研究对最佳健康的意义及影响。

Building capacity for service user and carer involvement in research: the implications and impact of best research for best health.

作者信息

Minogue Virginia, Girdlestone John

机构信息

West Yorkshire Mental Health Research and Development Consortium, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(4):422-35. doi: 10.1108/09526861011037470.

DOI:10.1108/09526861011037470
PMID:20535910
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of service user and carer involvement in NHS research and describe the nature of this involvement in three specialist mental health Trusts. It also aims to discuss the value of service user and carer involvement and present the perspective of the service user and research manager.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The paper reviews patient and public involvement policy and practice in the NHS and NHS research. It examines the effectiveness of involvement activity and utilises a case example to demonstrate the impact of patient/service user involvement on the NHS and the individuals who take part.

FINDINGS

The paper concludes that service user involvement is essential if research is to support the development of health services that clearly reflect the needs of the service user and impact positively on service quality.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Service user involvement is an established element of NHS research and development at both national and local level. The Department of Health strategy for research, Best Research for Best Health, reiterates both the importance of research that benefits the patient and the involvement of the service user in the research process. Despite this, the changes in Department of Health support funding for research, introduced by the strategy, may inadvertently lead to some NHS Trusts experiencing difficulty in resourcing this important activity.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The paper illustrates the effectiveness of successful patient and public involvement in research. It also identifies how involvement has developed in a fragmented and uncoordinated way and how it is threatened by a failure to embed it more consistently in research infrastructure.

摘要

目的

本文旨在探讨服务使用者和护理者参与国民保健制度(NHS)研究的作用,并描述在三个专业心理健康信托机构中这种参与的性质。它还旨在讨论服务使用者和护理者参与的价值,并呈现服务使用者和研究管理者的观点。

设计/方法/途径:本文回顾了国民保健制度及国民保健制度研究中患者和公众参与的政策与实践。它考察了参与活动的有效性,并利用一个案例来展示患者/服务使用者参与对国民保健制度及参与个体的影响。

研究结果

本文得出结论,如果研究要支持卫生服务的发展,使其明确反映服务使用者的需求并对服务质量产生积极影响,那么服务使用者的参与至关重要。

实际意义

服务使用者的参与是国民保健制度在国家和地方层面研发工作的既定要素。卫生部的研究战略“最佳健康的最佳研究”重申了有益于患者的研究的重要性以及服务使用者参与研究过程的重要性。尽管如此,该战略引入的卫生部对研究支持资金的变化可能会无意中导致一些国民保健制度信托机构在为这项重要活动提供资源方面遇到困难。

原创性/价值:本文阐述了患者和公众成功参与研究的有效性。它还指出了参与是以零散且不协调的方式发展起来的,以及由于未能更持续地将其纳入研究基础设施而受到的威胁。

相似文献

1
Building capacity for service user and carer involvement in research: the implications and impact of best research for best health.增强服务使用者和护理者参与研究的能力:最佳研究对最佳健康的意义及影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(4):422-35. doi: 10.1108/09526861011037470.
2
The impact of service user involvement in research.服务使用者参与研究的影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2005;18(2-3):103-12. doi: 10.1108/09526860510588133.
3
A potential model for the first all Wales mental health service user and carer-led research group.一个潜在的全威尔士心理健康服务使用者和照顾者主导的研究小组的模型。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Feb;17(1):31-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01473.x.
4
Developing a training package.开发一个培训包。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Jun 12;30(5):458-466. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2016-0084.
5
A stronger voice.一个更强有力的声音。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(2):211-22. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2014-0101.
6
Lone voices have an emotional content: focussing on mental health service user and carer involvement.个人观点带有情感内容:关注精神卫生服务使用者及照料者的参与情况。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(2):164-77. doi: 10.1108/09526861111105112.
7
Exploring the principles of best practice discharge to ensure patient involvement.探索最佳实践出院原则以确保患者参与。
Nurs Times. 2010;106(25):10-4.
8
Patient and public involvement in the coproduction of knowledge: reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study.患者和公众参与知识共创:对一项心理健康研究中定性数据分析的反思。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Aug;22(8):1126-37. doi: 10.1177/1049732312448541. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
9
Involving users in service planning: a focus group approach.让用户参与服务规划:焦点小组方法。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Sep;10(4):283-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.12.008. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
10
Involving the public in mental health and learning disability research: Can we, should we, do we?让公众参与心理健康和学习障碍研究:我们能吗?我们应该吗?我们做到了吗?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):570-579. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12404. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Meaningful Engagement of Persons Affected by Leprosy in Research: An Exploration of Its Interpretation, Barriers, and Opportunities.麻风病患者有意义地参与研究:对其理解、障碍和机遇的探索
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 10;8(1):52. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8010052.
2
Missing Persons Alert: Finding the Lost "Person" in Patient-Oriented Research.失踪人员警报:在以患者为导向的研究中寻找迷失的“人”。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Apr 11;9:23743735221092628. doi: 10.1177/23743735221092628. eCollection 2022.
3
Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study.
共同设计干预措施以增加老年患者活动能力的挑战:一项定性研究。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Apr 9;35(9):140-162. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0049.
4
Is Co-production Just a Pipe Dream for Applied Health Research Commissioning? An Exploratory Literature Review.联合生产对于应用健康研究委托而言只是一个白日梦吗?一项探索性文献综述。
Front Sociol. 2019 Jun 24;4:50. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00050. eCollection 2019.
5
European Forum for Primary Care: Position Paper for Primary Care Mental Health.欧洲基层医疗论坛:基层医疗心理健康立场文件。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Dec 3;21:e56. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000304.
6
Barriers to recruiting and retaining psychosis carers: a case study on the lessons learned from the Caring for Caregivers (C4C) trial.招募和留住精神病患者照料者的障碍:一项关于从“关爱照料者(C4C)试验”中吸取经验教训的案例研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Dec 17;12(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4832-9.
7
At the grassroots of home and community-based aged care: strategies for successful consumer engagement.居家和社区基础老年护理的根基:成功让消费者参与的策略。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e028754. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028754.
8
A Critical Discussion of Patient Engagement in Research.关于患者参与研究的批判性讨论
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017 Jan 31;4(1):39-41. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1273. eCollection 2017 Winter.
9
Patient and Public Engagement in Integrated Knowledge Translation Research: Are we there yet?患者及公众参与整合知识转化研究:我们做到了吗?
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Feb 12;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0139-1. eCollection 2019.
10
Applying a community-based participatory research framework to patient and family engagement in the development of patient-centered outcomes research and practice.将基于社区的参与式研究框架应用于患者和家属参与以患者为中心的结局研究和实践的发展。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Sep 8;8(5):683-691. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx026.