Vitiello B, Hill J L, Elia J, Cunningham E, McLeer S V, Behar D
Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1991 Dec;52(12):499-501.
The administration p.r.n. (as needed) of sedative medications is a widespread practice in the management of acute dyscontrol of child psychiatric inpatients. Its efficacy, however, has never been tested in a controlled clinical trial.
Twenty-one male inpatients, aged 5-13 years, participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the p.r.n. use of diphenhydramine, a sedative antihistaminic often used in child psychiatry wards. The patients' DSM-III-R diagnoses were conduct disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity, and major depression. Each patient in acute dyscontrol blindly received either oral or intramuscular doses of diphenhydramine 25-50 mg (N = 9) or placebo (N = 12). The Conners Abbreviated 10-Item Teacher Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions scale were completed before and 0.5, 1, and 2 hours after the dose.
Repeated measures ANOVA showed significant time effects, but no difference due to drug. The intramuscular route tended to be more effective than the oral, regardless of whether active drug or placebo was given.
The data indicate that if p.r.n. administrations are effective, this is a placebo effect. Likewise, intramuscular administrations are more effective because of a route effect ("the needle") and not because of a specific pharmacologic activity.
按需给予镇静药物是儿童精神科住院患者急性失控管理中的一种普遍做法。然而,其疗效从未在对照临床试验中得到检验。
21名年龄在5至13岁的男性住院患者参与了一项关于按需使用苯海拉明的双盲、安慰剂对照研究,苯海拉明是一种常用于儿童精神科病房的镇静抗组胺药。患者的DSM-III-R诊断为品行障碍、注意力缺陷多动障碍和重度抑郁症。每一位急性失控的患者均盲目接受口服或肌肉注射25 - 50毫克苯海拉明(N = 9)或安慰剂(N = 12)。在给药前以及给药后0.5、1和2小时完成康纳斯10项简版教师评定量表和临床总体印象量表。
重复测量方差分析显示出显著的时间效应,但未发现药物差异。无论给予的是活性药物还是安慰剂,肌肉注射途径往往比口服更有效。
数据表明,如果按需给药有效,那也是一种安慰剂效应。同样,肌肉注射更有效是由于途径效应(“打针”),而非特定的药理活性。