Høyvoll L R, Lunde K, Li Henrik S, Dahle S, Wentzel-Larsen T, Steinsvåg S K
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sorlandet Hospital, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Nov;264(11):1289-94. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0345-6. Epub 2007 May 26.
Nasal blockage is a common complaint in Family Practice. Decongestive nosedrops are frequently employed therapeutic measures. Due to a considerable risk of abuse and side effects, alternatives are wanted. The purpose of this study was to elucidate to what extent ENDS might represent an alternative to decongestive nose sprays (DNS). The effects of DNS (xylometazolin) and ENDS (BreatheRight) on subjective and objective nasal blockage were compared in 89 patients. Main outcome measures were recordings of nasal symptom scores on visual analogue scales (VAS), minimal cross-sectional areas (MCA) and nasal cavity volumes (NCV) as measured by acoustic rhinometry (AR), and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). ENDS significantly increased the MCA and the NCV in the anterior 0.0-3.0 cm of the nose compared to DNS, but had no effect on MCA from 3.0 to 5.4 cm behind the nostrils. In contrast to DNS, ENDS had no effect on the posterior NCV. ENDS and DNS gave comparable increase in nasal inspiratory flow as measured by PNIF, and in the subject's own experience of nasal obstruction. ENDS may represent an alternative to DNS as a measure against nasal blockage.
鼻阻塞是家庭医疗中常见的主诉。减充血滴鼻剂是常用的治疗措施。由于存在相当大的滥用风险和副作用,人们需要替代方法。本研究的目的是阐明电子烟在多大程度上可作为减充血鼻喷雾剂(DNS)的替代品。在89例患者中比较了DNS(赛洛唑啉)和电子烟(畅呼吸)对主观和客观鼻阻塞的影响。主要结局指标包括通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录鼻症状评分、通过鼻声反射(AR)测量的最小横截面积(MCA)和鼻腔容积(NCV),以及最大鼻吸气流量(PNIF)。与DNS相比,电子烟显著增加了鼻腔前部0.0 - 3.0厘米处的MCA和NCV,但对鼻孔后3.0至5.4厘米处的MCA没有影响。与DNS不同,电子烟对后部NCV没有影响。通过PNIF测量,电子烟和DNS在鼻吸气流量增加方面相当,并且在受试者自身的鼻阻塞体验方面也相当。电子烟可能作为一种对抗鼻阻塞的措施替代DNS。