Haag U J, Hess O M, Maier S E, Jakob M, Liu K, Meier D, Jenni R, Boesiger P, Anliker M, Krayenbuehl H P
Medical Policlinic, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Int J Card Imaging. 1991;7(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01797678.
Left ventricular (LV) wall thickness was determined by magnetic resonance (MR) in 15 patients (7 controls and 8 patients with coronary artery disease). End-diastolic (ed) and end-systolic (es) wall thickness were measured in a short axis view perpendicular to the LV long axis. Wall thickness measurements were compared to data obtained by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and M-mode echocardiography (Echo). End-diastolic and end-systolic wall thickness were significantly overestimated by MR (34% and 37%, respectively) when compared to DSA. In contrast, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic chamber diameter were significantly underestimated by MR (25% and 30%, respectively) when compared to DSA. However, fractioned shortening was similar (all NS) for MR (48 +/- 22%), DSA (54 +/- 15%) and Echo (44 +/- 10%), respectively. The mean difference (= accuracy) and the standard deviation of difference (= precision) for LV wall thickness was 0.4 +/- 0.2 cm between MR and DSA, 0.4 +/- 0.3 cm between MR and ECHO and 0.03 +/- 0.1 cm between DSA and ECHO. The correlation of wall thickness between MR and DSA (correlation coefficient r = 0.74, p less than 0.001) and between MR and Echo (r = 0.70, p less than 0.001) was good although the standard error of estimate (SEE) was 17% for MR vs. DSA and 21% for MR vs. Echo. The corresponding SEE for chamber diameter was 16% between MR and DSA and 19% between MR and Echo, respectively. Intraobserver variability for wall thickness determination by MR was excellent (correlation coefficient r = 0.99, p less than 0.001) SEE of 4%. Interobserver variability was also good (correlation coefficient r = 0.90, p less than 0.001) with a SEE of 12%. It is concluded that LV wall thickness and chamber diameter (short axis plane) can be determined by MR with good precision but only satisfactory accuracy. LV wall thickness is significantly overestimated probably due to signals from static blood which might be indistinguishable from the subendocardium.
通过磁共振成像(MR)对15例患者(7例对照者和8例冠心病患者)的左心室(LV)壁厚度进行了测定。在垂直于左心室长轴的短轴视图中测量舒张末期(ed)和收缩末期(es)的壁厚度。将壁厚度测量结果与通过数字减影血管造影(DSA)和M型超声心动图(Echo)获得的数据进行比较。与DSA相比,MR显著高估了舒张末期和收缩末期的壁厚度(分别高估34%和37%)。相反,与DSA相比,MR显著低估了左心室舒张末期和收缩末期的腔径(分别低估25%和30%)。然而,MR(48±22%)、DSA(54±15%)和Echo(44±10%)的缩短分数相似(均无统计学差异)。MR与DSA之间左心室壁厚度的平均差值(=准确性)和差值的标准差(=精密度)为0.4±0.2cm,MR与ECHO之间为0.4±0.3cm,DSA与ECHO之间为0.03±0.1cm。MR与DSA之间(相关系数r = 0.74,p<0.001)以及MR与Echo之间(r = 0.70,p<0.001)的壁厚度相关性良好,尽管MR与DSA之间的估计标准误差(SEE)为17%,MR与Echo之间为21%。腔径的相应SEE在MR与DSA之间为16%,在MR与Echo之间为19%。MR测定壁厚度的观察者内变异性极佳(相关系数r = 0.99,p<0.001),SEE为4%。观察者间变异性也良好(相关系数r = 0.90,p<0.001),SEE为12%。得出的结论是,左心室壁厚度和腔径(短轴平面)可通过MR以良好的精密度但仅以令人满意的准确性来确定。左心室壁厚度被显著高估,可能是由于来自静态血液的信号,这可能与心内膜下组织难以区分。