The latent structure and coincidence of hypohedonia and schizotypy and their validity as indices of psychometric risk for schizophrenia.

Recent exchanges on the place of hypohedonia within Meehl's theory of schizotaxia, schizotypy, and schizophrenia focus on evidence of the taxonicity of asociality, not hedonic capacity per se. Two hypotheses were contrasted, one that hypohedonia is a nonpathological individual difference variable independent of schizotypy, the other that schizotypy and hypohedonia tap independent taxonic processes that predict the emergence of positive and negative signs of schizophrenia, respectively. Undergraduates (n = 1,543) completed a multifaceted measure of schizotypy and hypohedonia. A consecutive subsample of these (n = 284) also completed a continuous performance test and the Symptom Checklist 90-Revised. Independent taxometric analyses (maximum covariance and maximum eigenvalue) indicated schizotypy was taxonic and hypohedonia was dimensional. Their coincidence was no greater than chance. Schizotypy was associated with impaired attention and significant psychological distress, whereas hypohedonia was not. Hypohedonia does not behave like a core component of schizotypy.