• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症患者生物同胞的精神分裂特质的潜在分类学。

The Latent Taxonicity of Schizotypy in Biological Siblings of Probands With Schizophrenia.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):922-932. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx143.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbx143
PMID:29036385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6007790/
Abstract

If schizotypy is a taxonic liability for schizophrenia with a general population prevalence of ~10%, it should also be taxonic among biological siblings of probands with schizophrenia. Moreover, assuming this is so, siblings' schizotypy class membership should be predicted by probands' familial load for psychotic disorder and clinical severity, consistent with a multifactorial polygenic threshold model of schizophrenia. We tested these hypotheses in the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) Study where siblings of probands (n = 792) and unaffected controls (n = 559) provided self-report ratings on the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE). Maximum covariance analyses of control group ratings led to the identification of CAPE items sensitive to nonredundant positive and negative schizotypy classes in the control group (prevalence = 7.9% and 11.1%, respectively). When the same taxonic solution was applied to siblings' CAPE rating, taxometric analyses yielded evidence for larger positive and negative schizotypy classes among siblings (prevalence = 14.1% and 21.8%, respectively). Whereas probands' familial loads for bipolar disorder or drug use disorders did not predict siblings' membership in the schizotypy classes, probands' familial load for psychotic disorder did. Siblings were more likely to be members of the positive schizotypy class where their probands were more severely affected. The pattern of findings is consistent with Meehl's argument that schizotypy reflects liability for schizophrenia.

摘要

如果精神分裂症特质是一种具有约 10%一般人群患病率的精神分裂症分类责任因素,那么它也应该在精神分裂症患者的生物学兄弟姐妹中具有分类责任因素。此外,假设情况确实如此,那么兄弟姐妹的精神分裂症特质类别成员身份应该可以由患者的精神病家族负担和临床严重程度来预测,这与精神分裂症的多因素多基因阈值模型一致。我们在遗传风险和精神障碍预后(GROUP)研究中检验了这些假设,该研究中患者(n = 792)和未受影响的对照组(n = 559)的兄弟姐妹提供了社区心理体验评估量表(CAPE)的自我报告评分。对对照组评分进行最大协方差分析导致确定了 CAPE 项目,这些项目可敏感地识别对照组中不冗余的阳性和阴性精神分裂症特质类别(患病率分别为 7.9%和 11.1%)。当将相同的分类解决方案应用于兄弟姐妹的 CAPE 评分时,分类分析结果表明,兄弟姐妹中的阳性和阴性精神分裂症特质类别更大(患病率分别为 14.1%和 21.8%)。尽管患者的双相情感障碍或药物使用障碍家族负担不能预测兄弟姐妹是否属于精神分裂症特质类别,但患者的精神病家族负担可以。在其患者受影响更严重的情况下,兄弟姐妹更有可能成为阳性精神分裂症特质类别的成员。研究结果的模式与 Meehl 的论点一致,即精神分裂症特质反映了对精神分裂症的易感性。

相似文献

1
The Latent Taxonicity of Schizotypy in Biological Siblings of Probands With Schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者生物同胞的精神分裂特质的潜在分类学。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):922-932. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx143.
2
Testing the Validity of Taxonic Schizotypy Using Genetic and Environmental Risk Variables.使用遗传和环境风险变量检验分类学上的分裂型人格特质的有效性。
Schizophr Bull. 2017 May 1;43(3):633-643. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw108.
3
The latent structure and coincidence of hypohedonia and schizotypy and their validity as indices of psychometric risk for schizophrenia.快感缺乏与精神分裂症型人格特质的潜在结构、重合性及其作为精神分裂症心理测量风险指标的效度
J Pers Disord. 2007 Jun;21(3):225-42. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.3.225.
4
Dimensionality vs taxonicity of schizotypy: some new data and challenges ahead.分裂型人格特质的维度性与类别性:一些新数据及面临的挑战
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S465-74. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu221.
5
The taxonicity of schizotypy: does the same taxonic class structure emerge from analyses of different attributes of schizotypy and from fundamentally different statistical methods?分裂型特质的分类学特性:不同的分裂型特质分析属性和从根本上不同的统计方法得出的分类结构是否相同?
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 15;210(2):414-21. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
6
Confirming the latent structure and base rate of schizotypy: a taxometric analysis.验证分裂型人格特质的潜在结构和基础比率:一项类属分析。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1992 Aug;101(3):567-71. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.101.3.567.
7
Movement disorders are associated with schizotypy in unaffected siblings of patients with non-affective psychosis.运动障碍与非情感性精神病患者未受影响的兄弟姐妹的精神分裂症倾向有关。
Psychol Med. 2011 Oct;41(10):2141-7. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711000389. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
8
The taxonicity of schizotypy: a replication.分裂型特质的分类性:一项重复研究。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1995 Feb;104(1):26-31. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.104.1.26.
9
Developmental profiles of schizotypy in the general population: A record linkage study of Australian children aged 11-12 years.一般人群中精神分裂症特质的发展轨迹:对 11-12 岁澳大利亚儿童的记录链接研究。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2022 Sep;61(3):836-858. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12363. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
10
Detection of familial schizophrenia using a psychometric measure of schizotypy.使用分裂型人格的心理测量方法检测家族性精神分裂症。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Oct;46(10):902-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810100044008.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment in Schizotypy: A Systematic Review Towards Clinical and Personality Models.分裂型人格特质评估:针对临床与人格模型的系统综述
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2022 Jan-Jun;15(1):84-97. doi: 10.21500/20112084.5292.
2
Investigating the relationship of COVID-19 related stress and media consumption with schizotypy, depression, and anxiety in cross-sectional surveys repeated throughout the pandemic in Germany and the UK.调查德国和英国在整个大流行期间通过横断面调查重复进行的 COVID-19 相关压力和媒体消费与精神分裂症倾向、抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。
Elife. 2022 Jul 4;11:e75893. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75893.
3
Multivariate classification of schizophrenia and its familial risk based on load-dependent attentional control brain functional connectivity.基于依赖负荷的注意控制脑功能连接对精神分裂症及其家族风险的多变量分类。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 Mar;45(4):613-621. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0532-3. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
4
Enhancing Psychosis-Spectrum Nosology Through an International Data Sharing Initiative.通过国际数据共享倡议增强精神病谱分类学。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Oct 15;44(suppl_2):S460-S467. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby059.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale: A new measure for assessing positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy.多维精神分裂症量表的编制及心理计量学特性:一种用于评估正性、负性和瓦解性精神分裂症特质的新工具。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Mar;193:209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
2
Testing the Validity of Taxonic Schizotypy Using Genetic and Environmental Risk Variables.使用遗传和环境风险变量检验分类学上的分裂型人格特质的有效性。
Schizophr Bull. 2017 May 1;43(3):633-643. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw108.
3
Psychometric Properties of "Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences": Review and Meta-analyses.《“心理体验的社区评估”的心理测量特性:综述与荟萃分析》
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Jan;42(1):34-44. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv088. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
4
Thinking clearly about schizotypy: hewing to the schizophrenia liability core, considering interesting tangents, and avoiding conceptual quicksand.清晰地思考分裂型人格特质:紧扣精神分裂症易感性核心,考虑有趣的旁支,并避免陷入概念陷阱。
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S483-91. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu184.
5
Dimensionality vs taxonicity of schizotypy: some new data and challenges ahead.分裂型人格特质的维度性与类别性:一些新数据及面临的挑战
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S465-74. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu221.
6
Copy number variation in schizophrenia in Sweden.瑞典精神分裂症中的拷贝数变异
Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;19(7):762-73. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.40. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
7
The taxonicity of schizotypy: does the same taxonic class structure emerge from analyses of different attributes of schizotypy and from fundamentally different statistical methods?分裂型特质的分类学特性:不同的分裂型特质分析属性和从根本上不同的统计方法得出的分类结构是否相同?
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 15;210(2):414-21. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
8
Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one.为何项目与包裹之争并非不可调和。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Sep;18(3):285-300. doi: 10.1037/a0033266. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
9
Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: two wrongs do not make a right--camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models.为什么项目包几乎从不合适:双重错误并不能造成正确——在 CFA 模型中用项目包掩盖误指定。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Sep;18(3):257-84. doi: 10.1037/a0032773. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
10
Does a latent class underlie schizotypal personality disorder? Implications for schizophrenia.是否存在潜在的精神分裂型人格障碍类别?对精神分裂症的影响。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 May;122(2):475-91. doi: 10.1037/a0032713.