Zheng Guang-ying, Du Jun, Zhang Jin-song, Liu Su-bing, Nie Xiao-li, Zhu Xiao-hong, Tang Xiu-xia, Xin Bao-li, Mai Zhi-bin, Zhang Wei-xia
Department of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 May 20;120(10):882-5.
Astigmatism is one of the most significant obstacles for achieving satisfactory visual function. This study was to evaluate the influence of astigmatism on contrast sensitivity (CS) and higher-order aberrations.
CS, accommodation response and wavefront aberration were measured in 113 patients with astigmatism, aged 18 - 36 years. Both single and binocular visual performance were examined under four lighting conditions: photopia, photopia with glare, scotopia and scotopia with glare respectively. Accommodation response was classified as normal, abnormal and low. The contribution of the power and axis of astigmatism to CS, accommodation response and wavefront aberration was analyzed.
As the dioptric power of astigmatism increased, the loss of CS spatial frequency changed from high to intermediate, and then to low frequency. CS scores varied at different illuminance levels, descending in the following sequence: photopia, photopia with glare, scotopia, and scotopia with glare. However, the normal accommodation group showed better CS values under photopia with glare than without glare. The range of influenced direction of sine-wave gratings remained mostly at the meridian line of high dioptric power, which would be expanded when optical accommadation attenuated. The patients with symmetrical astigmatism got higher CS scores with binoculus vision than with dominant eye vision, while the patients with asymmetrical astigmatism did this only at scotopia with glare. Among higher-order aberrations, coma aberration, secondary coma aberration and the total higher order aberration were influenced by astigmatism, all of which rising with the power of astigmatism increased.
Reducing astigmatism might improve the performance of visual function. Not only the power of astigmatism should be cut down, but also the binocular axes should be made symmetrically.
散光 是实现满意视觉功能的最主要障碍之一。本研究旨在评估散光对对比敏感度(CS)和高阶像差的影响。
对113例年龄在18至36岁的散光患者进行CS、调节反应和波前像差测量。分别在四种光照条件下检查单眼和双眼视觉性能:明视觉、有眩光的明视觉、暗视觉和有眩光的暗视觉。调节反应分为正常、异常和低下。分析散光的度数和轴位对CS、调节反应和波前像差的影响。
随着散光度数增加,CS空间频率损失从高频变为中频,然后变为低频。CS得分在不同照度水平下有所不同,按以下顺序下降:明视觉、有眩光的明视觉、暗视觉、有眩光的暗视觉。然而,正常调节组在有眩光的明视觉下的CS值比无眩光时更好。正弦波光栅的影响方向范围大多保持在高屈光度子午线,当光学调节减弱时会扩大。对称散光患者双眼视觉的CS得分高于优势眼视觉,而非对称散光患者仅在有眩光的暗视觉下如此。在高阶像差中,彗差、二级彗差和总高阶像差受散光影响,均随散光度数增加而增加。
减少散光可能改善视觉功能表现。不仅应降低散光度数,还应使双眼轴位对称。