• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving medical practice: a conceptual framework.改进医疗实践:一个概念框架。
Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):251-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.666.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
4
Fostering evidence-based quality improvement for patient-centered medical homes: Initiating local quality councils to transform primary care.促进以患者为中心的医疗之家的循证质量改进:启动地方质量委员会以转变初级保健。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Apr/Jun;43(2):168-180. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000138.
5
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
6
7
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
8
Transformational change in health care systems: an organizational model.医疗保健系统的转型变革:一种组织模式。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Oct-Dec;32(4):309-20. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296785.29718.5d.
9
Patient-centered innovation in health care organizations: a conceptual framework and case study application.以患者为中心的医疗组织创新:概念框架与案例研究应用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Apr-Jun;38(2):166-75. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31825e718a.
10
Redesigning health systems for quality: Lessons from emerging practices.为提高质量而重新设计卫生系统:新兴实践的经验教训。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Nov;32(11):599-611. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32078-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Care Clinicians' Interest In, and Barriers To, Medication Abortion.初级保健临床医生对药物流产的兴趣和障碍。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Jul-Aug;37(4):680-689. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240005R1.
2
Healthcare Quality Improvement: The Need for a Macro-Systems Approach.医疗质量改进:宏观系统方法的必要性。
Annu IEEE Syst Conf. 2022 Apr;2022. doi: 10.1109/syscon53536.2022.9773793. Epub 2022 May 16.
3
Guiding Post-Hospital Recovery by 'What Matters:' Implementation of Patient Priorities Identification in a VA Community Living Center.以“重要事项”指导出院后康复:在退伍军人事务部社区生活中心实施患者优先事项识别
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Jul 4;8(4):74. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8040074.
4
An Assessment of Weight Loss Management in Health System Primary Care Practices.卫生系统基层医疗保健实践中的体重管理评估。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Feb 8;36(1):51-65. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220224R1. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
5
Identifying Priorities and Strategies for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Tribal Clinics.确定部落诊所改善结直肠癌筛查的优先事项和策略。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221132516. doi: 10.1177/10732748221132516.
6
Organizational Factors Associated with Guideline Concordance of Chronic Disease Care and Management Practices.与慢性病照护及管理实践指南一致性相关的组织因素
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Sep 16. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.AP.210502.
7
Strategies for Dose Optimization: Views From Health Care Systems.剂量优化策略:医疗保健系统的观点。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Apr;19(4):534-541. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
8
A Multi-Center Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Investigate Interpersonal Violence Screening for Public Health Promotion.多中心结构方程建模方法研究人际暴力筛查在公共健康促进中的应用。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 11;9:637222. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.637222. eCollection 2021.
9
Factors associated with successful implementation of telehealth abortion in 4 United States clinical practice settings.与美国 4 个临床实践环境中成功实施远程医疗流产相关的因素。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.021. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
10
Integration of Improvement and Implementation Science in Practice-Based Research Networks: a Longitudinal, Comparative Case Study.基于实践的研究网络中改进和实施科学的整合:一项纵向、比较案例研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1503-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06610-1. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges of change: a qualitative study of chronic care model implementation.变革的挑战:对慢性病护理模式实施情况的定性研究
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Jul-Aug;4(4):317-26. doi: 10.1370/afm.570.
2
Care quality and implementation of the chronic care model: a quantitative study.慢性护理模式的护理质量与实施:一项定量研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Jul-Aug;4(4):310-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.571.
3
Transforming medical care: case study of an exemplary, small medical group.变革医疗保健:一个模范小型医疗集团的案例研究
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;4(2):109-16. doi: 10.1370/afm.424.
4
Effect of improved primary care access on quality of depression care.改善基层医疗服务可及性对抑郁症护理质量的影响。
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;4(1):69-74. doi: 10.1370/afm.426.
5
A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses.一项关于改善慢性病护理干预措施的荟萃分析。
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Aug;11(8):478-88.
6
Randomized trial of quality improvement intervention to improve diabetes care in primary care settings.在基层医疗环境中改善糖尿病护理的质量改进干预措施的随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2005 Aug;28(8):1890-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.8.1890.
7
If you've seen one quality improvement collaborative ..如果你见过一个质量改进协作项目……
Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3(3):198-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.304.
8
Does improved access to care affect utilization and costs for patients with chronic conditions?获得医疗服务的改善是否会影响慢性病患者的医疗服务利用情况和费用?
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Oct;10(10):717-22.
9
What are the facilitators and barriers in physician organizations' use of care management processes?医师组织在使用护理管理流程方面的促进因素和障碍有哪些?
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Sep;30(9):505-14. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(04)30059-6.
10
Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions.提高慢性病医疗保健质量。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):299-305. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.4.299.

改进医疗实践:一个概念框架。

Improving medical practice: a conceptual framework.

作者信息

Solberg Leif I

机构信息

HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minn 55440, USA.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):251-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.666.

DOI:10.1370/afm.666
PMID:17548853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1886486/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to produce a relatively simple conceptual framework for guiding and studying practice improvement.

METHODS

I summarize the lessons from my experience with a variety of quality improvement research studies during the last 30 years, supplemented with relevant literature from both medicine and other industries about the issues associated with successful quality improvement.

RESULTS

My experience suggests that organizational leadership with an urgent vision for change, ability to manage the change process, and selection of systematic changes capable of fulfilling the vision are each critical for successful quality improvement. Published literature from other industries emphasizes the importance of a goal-directed change process managed by leaders who recognize the need to engage their employees and other leaders in a disciplined but flexible way that accommodates external and internal factors and uses teams and group learning. It also suggests the importance of organizational context and the level of external and internal barriers and facilitators for change. The resulting model proposes that priority, change process, and care process content are necessary for measurable improvements in quality of care and patient outcomes, although internal and external barriers must also be attended to and addressed.

CONCLUSION

This framework may provide a guide to those in the front lines of care who would like to make the care transformations that are needed to greatly improve care. It may also be helpful to those who are developing or testing interventions and recruiting medical practices for such change efforts.

摘要

目的

本文旨在构建一个相对简单的概念框架,以指导和研究实践改进。

方法

我总结了过去30年中参与各种质量改进研究的经验教训,并辅以医学和其他行业中关于成功质量改进相关问题的文献。

结果

我的经验表明,具有紧迫变革愿景的组织领导力、管理变革过程的能力以及选择能够实现愿景的系统性变革,对于成功的质量改进都至关重要。其他行业发表的文献强调了由领导者管理的目标导向变革过程的重要性,这些领导者认识到需要以一种既严谨又灵活的方式让员工和其他领导者参与进来,以适应外部和内部因素,并利用团队和群体学习。文献还指出了组织背景以及变革的外部和内部障碍与促进因素的重要性。由此产生的模型提出,尽管必须关注并解决内部和外部障碍,但优先级、变革过程和护理过程内容对于可衡量的护理质量和患者结局的改善是必要的。

结论

该框架可为那些希望进行护理变革以大幅改善护理的一线护理人员提供指导。对于那些正在开发或测试干预措施以及招募医疗实践机构进行此类变革努力的人来说,它可能也会有所帮助。