van de Graaf Elizabeth S, van der Sterre Geertje W, van Kempen-du Saar Hanneke, Simonsz Brigitte, Looman Caspar W N, Simonsz Huib J
Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;245(11):1589-95. doi: 10.1007/s00417-007-0594-5. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
We recently developed the Amblyopia & Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ) to assess the quality of life in amblyopia and/or strabismus patients, and evaluated its content and criterion validity. The A&SQ was now validated clinically by correlating its outcome with past and current orthoptic parameters in a historic cohort of amblyopia and/or strabismus patients.
The cohort was derived from all 471 patients who were treated by occlusion therapy in the Waterland Hospital in Purmerend between 1968 and 1974 and born between 1962 and 1972. All children with insufficient visual acuity from the Waterland area had been referred to a single ophthalmologist and orthoptist. Of these, 203 were traced, and 174 filled out the A&SQ. In 137 of these, binocular vision, visual acuity, and angle of strabismus were reassessed 30-35 years after occlusion therapy. These clinical parameters were correlated with the five A&SQ domains: "distance estimation", "visual disorientation", "fear of losing the better eye", "diplopia", and "social contact and cosmetic problems".
The current acuity at distance of the amblyopic eye and reading acuity of the amblyopic eye correlated significantly with all five A&SQ domains (significance level P = 0.01-P = 0.05). Weaker correlations were found for binocularity. In spite of the expectation that stereopsis should strongly correlate with the domain "distance estimation", and angle of strabismus with the domain "social contact and cosmetic problems", the acuity of the amblyopic eye was the overall dominant parameter.
The adult acuity of the amblyopic eye seems the most important clinical determinant for quality of life in amblyopia and/or strabismus patients, even in domains of distance estimation, visual disorientation, and social contact and cosmetic problems, although intermediate determinants cannot be excluded.
我们最近开发了弱视与斜视问卷(A&SQ)来评估弱视和/或斜视患者的生活质量,并对其内容和标准效度进行了评估。现在,通过将A&SQ的结果与一组弱视和/或斜视患者历史队列中的既往和当前视光学参数进行关联,对其进行了临床验证。
该队列来自1968年至1974年在普尔默伦德的沃特兰医院接受遮盖治疗且出生于1962年至1972年的所有471例患者。沃特兰地区所有视力不足的儿童都被转诊给了一位眼科医生和视光师。其中,203例被追踪到,174例填写了A&SQ。在这些患者中,137例在遮盖治疗30 - 35年后重新评估了双眼视功能、视力和斜视角度。这些临床参数与A&SQ的五个领域相关:“距离估计”、“视觉定向障碍”、“担心失去较好的眼睛”、“复视”以及“社交接触和外貌问题”。
弱视眼的当前远视力和弱视眼的阅读视力与A&SQ的所有五个领域均显著相关(显著性水平P = 0.01 - P = 0.05)。发现双眼视功能的相关性较弱。尽管预期立体视应与“距离估计”领域密切相关,斜视角度应与“社交接触和外貌问题”领域密切相关,但弱视眼的视力是总体上占主导地位的参数。
弱视眼的成人视力似乎是弱视和/或斜视患者生活质量最重要的临床决定因素,即使在距离估计、视觉定向障碍以及社交接触和外貌问题等领域也是如此,尽管不能排除中间决定因素。