Tapert Susan F, Schweinsburg Alecia D, Drummond Sean P A, Paulus Martin P, Brown Sandra A, Yang Tony T, Frank Lawrence R
VA San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive 116B, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Oct;194(2):173-83. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0823-y. Epub 2007 Jun 9.
Marijuana intoxication appears to impair response inhibition, but it is unclear if impaired inhibition and associated brain abnormalities persist after prolonged abstinence among adolescent users. We hypothesized that brain activation during a go/no-go task would show persistent abnormalities in adolescent marijuana users after 28 days of abstinence.
Adolescents with (n = 16) and without (n = 17) histories of marijuana use were compared on blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response to a go/no-go task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) after 28 days of monitored abstinence. Participants had no neurological problems or Axis I diagnoses other than cannabis abuse/dependence.
Marijuana users did not differ from non-users on task performance but showed more BOLD response than non-users during inhibition trials in right dorsolateral prefrontal, bilateral medial frontal, bilateral inferior and superior parietal lobules, and right occipital gyri, as well as during "go" trials in right prefrontal, insular, and parietal cortices (p < 0.05, clusters > 943 microl). Differences remained significant even after controlling for lifetime and recent alcohol use.
Adolescent marijuana users relative to non-users showed increased brain processing effort during an inhibition task in the presence of similar task performance, even after 28 days of abstinence. Thus, increased brain processing effort to achieve inhibition may predate the onset of regular use or result from it. Future investigations will need to determine whether increased brain processing effort is associated with risk to use.
大麻中毒似乎会损害反应抑制能力,但目前尚不清楚青少年使用者长期 abstinence 后,抑制能力受损及相关脑异常是否持续存在。我们假设在禁戒28天后,青少年大麻使用者在执行停止信号任务时的大脑激活会显示出持续异常。
在28天的监测 abstinence 后,对有(n = 16)和无(n = 17)大麻使用史的青少年进行功能磁共振成像(fMRI),比较他们对停止信号任务的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)反应。参与者除了大麻滥用/依赖外,没有神经问题或轴I诊断。
大麻使用者与非使用者在任务表现上没有差异,但在抑制试验期间,右侧背外侧前额叶、双侧内侧额叶、双侧顶叶上下小叶和右侧枕回,以及在右侧前额叶、岛叶和顶叶皮质的“执行”试验中,大麻使用者的BOLD反应比非使用者更多(p < 0.05,簇> 943微升)。即使在控制了终生和近期饮酒情况后,差异仍然显著。
即使在禁戒28天后,与非使用者相比,青少年大麻使用者在抑制任务期间,在任务表现相似的情况下,大脑处理工作量增加。因此,为实现抑制而增加的大脑处理工作量可能在经常使用之前就已出现,或者是经常使用的结果。未来的研究需要确定增加的大脑处理工作量是否与使用风险相关。