Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 May;239(5):1629-1641. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06143-3. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Preclinical and human studies suggest that adolescent cannabis use may be associated with worse cognitive outcomes than adult cannabis use. We investigated the associations between chronic cannabis use and cognitive function in adolescent and adult cannabis users and controls. We hypothesised user-status would be negatively associated with cognitive function and this relationship would be stronger in adolescents than adults.
As part of the 'CannTeen' project, this cross-sectional study assessed cognitive performance in adolescent cannabis users (n = 76; 16-17-year-olds), adolescent controls (n = 63), adult cannabis users (n = 71; 26-29-year-olds) and adult controls (n = 64). Users used cannabis 1-7 days/week. Adolescent and adult cannabis users were matched on cannabis use frequency (4 days/week) and time since last use (2.5 days). Verbal episodic memory (VEM) was assessed using the prose recall task, spatial working memory (SWM) was assessed using the spatial n-back task, and response inhibition was assessed with the stop-signal task. Primary outcome variables were: delayed recall, 3-back discriminability, and stop signal reaction time, respectively.
Users had worse VEM than controls (F(1,268) = 7.423, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences between user-groups on SWM or response inhibition. Null differences were supported by Bayesian analyses. No significant interactions between age-group and user-group were found for VEM, SWM, or response inhibition.
Consistent with previous research, there was an association between chronic cannabis use and poorer VEM, but chronic cannabis use was not associated with SWM or response inhibition. We did not find evidence for heightened adolescent vulnerability to cannabis-related cognitive impairment.
临床前和人体研究表明,青少年使用大麻可能与成年大麻使用者相比,认知结果更差。我们调查了青少年和成年大麻使用者及对照者中慢性大麻使用与认知功能之间的关系。我们假设使用者状态与认知功能呈负相关,且这种关系在青少年中比成年中更强。
作为“CannTeen”项目的一部分,这项横断面研究评估了青少年大麻使用者(n=76;16-17 岁)、青少年对照组(n=63)、成年大麻使用者(n=71;26-29 岁)和成年对照组(n=64)的认知表现。使用者每周使用大麻 1-7 天。根据大麻使用频率(每周 4 天)和上次使用时间(2.5 天),对青少年和成年大麻使用者进行匹配。使用叙事回忆任务评估言语情节记忆(VEM),使用空间 n 回任务评估空间工作记忆(SWM),使用停止信号任务评估反应抑制。主要的结果变量分别为:延迟回忆、3 回区分度和停止信号反应时间。
与对照组相比,使用者的 VEM 较差(F(1,268)=7.423,p=0.007)。在 SWM 或反应抑制方面,使用者之间没有显著差异。贝叶斯分析支持了零差异的结论。在 VEM、SWM 或反应抑制方面,未发现年龄组和使用者组之间存在显著的交互作用。
与先前的研究一致,慢性大麻使用与较差的 VEM 相关,但慢性大麻使用与 SWM 或反应抑制无关。我们没有发现青少年对大麻相关认知损伤更易受影响的证据。