Suppr超能文献

儿童泌尿外科成像导管插入术期间,氧化亚氮镇静与无镇静的比较。

Sedation with nitrous oxide compared with no sedation during catheterization for urologic imaging in children.

作者信息

Zier Judith L, Kvam Kathryn A, Kurachek Stephen C, Finkelstein Marsha

机构信息

Pediatric Critical Care, Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Radiol. 2007 Jul;37(7):678-84. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0508-z. Epub 2007 May 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various strategies to mitigate children's distress during voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) have been described. Sedation with nitrous oxide is comparable to that with oral midazolam for VCUG, but a side-by-side comparison of nitrous oxide sedation and routine care is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The effects of sedation/analgesia using 70% nitrous oxide and routine care for VCUG and radionuclide cystography (RNC) were compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sample of 204 children 4-18 years of age scheduled for VCUG or RNC with sedation or routine care were enrolled in this prospective study. Nitrous oxide/oxygen (70%/30%) was administered during urethral catheterization to children in the sedated group. The outcomes recorded included observed distress using the Brief Behavioral Distress Score, self-reported pain, and time in department.

RESULTS

The study included 204 patients (99 nonsedated, 105 sedated) with a median age of 6.3 years (range 4.0-15.2 years). Distress and pain scores were greater in nonsedated than in sedated patients (P < 0.001). Time in department was longer in the sedated group (90 min vs. 30 min); however, time from entry to catheterization in a non-imaging area accounted for most of the difference. There was no difference in radiologic imaging time.

CONCLUSION

Sedation with nitrous oxide is effective in reducing distress and pain during catheterization for VCUG or RNC in children.

摘要

背景

已有多种减轻儿童排尿性膀胱尿道造影(VCUG)时痛苦的策略被描述。氧化亚氮镇静与口服咪达唑仑用于VCUG的效果相当,但缺乏氧化亚氮镇静与常规护理的并行比较。

目的

比较使用70%氧化亚氮进行镇静/镇痛以及常规护理用于VCUG和放射性核素膀胱造影(RNC)的效果。

材料与方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了204名4 - 18岁计划接受VCUG或RNC且接受镇静或常规护理的儿童。在导尿期间,向镇静组儿童给予氧化亚氮/氧气(70%/30%)。记录的结果包括使用简短行为痛苦评分观察到的痛苦、自我报告的疼痛以及在科室的时间。

结果

该研究纳入了204名患者(99名未镇静,1​​05名镇静),中位年龄为6.3岁(范围4.0 - 15.2岁)。未镇静患者的痛苦和疼痛评分高于镇静患者(P < 0.001)。镇静组在科室的时间更长(90分钟对30分钟);然而,在非成像区域从进入到导尿的时间占了大部分差异。放射成像时间没有差异。

结论

氧化亚氮镇静可有效减轻儿童在VCUG或RNC导尿期间的痛苦和疼痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验