• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌的扩散加权磁共振成像——单次激发快速自旋回波与回波平面成像序列的比较

Diffusion-weighted MRI in prostate cancer -- comparison between single-shot fast spin echo and echo planar imaging sequences.

作者信息

Kozlowski Piotr, Chang Silvia D, Goldenberg S Larry

机构信息

Prostate Centre at Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6.

出版信息

Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jan;26(1):72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2007.04.008
PMID:17566687
Abstract

Diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI at 1.5 T was carried out in two groups of patients. MRI data were correlated with the biopsy and histopathology (where available). The performance of two sequences -- a single-shot FSE (14 patients) and a single-shot EPI (15 patients) -- was compared. Average ADC values from the normal peripheral zone (PZ), central gland (CG) and the tumour [prostate carcinoma (PCa)] were calculated from b values of 0 and 600. Tukey-Kramer test was used for statistical analysis. EPI produced higher values of ADC (10(-3) mm(2)/s) than FSE sequence: 1.992+/-0.208 vs. 1.573+/-0.270 in PZ (P<.001), 1.518+/-0.126 vs. 1.373+/-0.179 in CG and 1.214+/-0.254 vs. 0.993+/-0.158 in PCa (P<.01). In conclusion, both EPI and FSE sequences showed differences in ADC between normal PZ, CG and PCa; however, EPI produced significantly higher ADC values than FSE.

摘要

对两组患者进行了1.5T的扩散加权(DW)磁共振成像检查。磁共振成像数据与活检及组织病理学结果(若有)进行了关联。比较了两种序列——单次激发快速自旋回波序列(14例患者)和单次激发回波平面成像序列(15例患者)的性能。根据b值为0和600时的数据计算正常外周带(PZ)、中央腺体(CG)及肿瘤[前列腺癌(PCa)]的平均表观扩散系数(ADC)值。采用Tukey-Kramer检验进行统计学分析。回波平面成像序列产生的ADC值(10⁻³mm²/s)高于快速自旋回波序列:外周带中分别为1.992±0.208和1.573±0.270(P<0.001),中央腺体中分别为1.518±0.126和1.373±0.179,前列腺癌中分别为1.214±0.254和0.993±0.158(P<0.01)。总之,回波平面成像序列和快速自旋回波序列均显示正常外周带、中央腺体及前列腺癌之间的ADC存在差异;然而,回波平面成像序列产生的ADC值显著高于快速自旋回波序列。

相似文献

1
Diffusion-weighted MRI in prostate cancer -- comparison between single-shot fast spin echo and echo planar imaging sequences.前列腺癌的扩散加权磁共振成像——单次激发快速自旋回波与回波平面成像序列的比较
Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jan;26(1):72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
2
In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissue using thin-slice echo-planar imaging.使用薄层回波平面成像对正常和恶性前列腺组织中的表观扩散系数进行体内测量。
Radiol Med. 2006 Dec;111(8):1124-33. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0110-8. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
3
Diffusion-weighted imaging in the prostate: an apparent diffusion coefficient comparison of half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and echo planar imaging.前列腺弥散加权成像:半傅里叶采集单次激发涡轮自旋回波和回波平面成像的表观弥散系数比较。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Feb;30(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.09.024. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
4
In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging.使用回波平面成像技术对正常和恶性前列腺组织中的表观扩散系数进行体内测量。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Aug;16(2):196-200. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10139.
5
Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.扩散加权成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像在前列腺移行区癌诊断中的应用价值
Acta Radiol. 2008 Dec;49(10):1207-13. doi: 10.1080/02841850802508959.
6
Correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance data with cellularity in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中扩散加权磁共振数据与细胞密度的相关性。
BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(7):883-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08130.x. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
7
Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer.前列腺癌的扩散张量磁共振成像
Invest Radiol. 2007 Jun;42(6):412-9. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000264059.46444.bf.
8
Age-related and zonal anatomical changes of apparent diffusion coefficient values in normal human prostatic tissues.正常人体前列腺组织中表观扩散系数值的年龄相关及区域解剖学变化
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Mar;27(3):552-6. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21117.
9
Effect of shot number on the calculated apparent diffusion coefficient in phantoms and in human liver in diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging.在扩散加权回波平面成像中,脉冲数对体模及人体肝脏中计算所得表观扩散系数的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Sep;30(3):547-53. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21861.
10
Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T for differentiation of malignant and benign tissue in transition and peripheral zones: preliminary results.3T磁共振前列腺扩散加权成像用于鉴别移行区和外周带良恶性组织:初步结果
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 May-Jun;31(3):449-54. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000243456.00437.59.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved prostate cancer diagnosis: upgraded prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scores by zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging enhance deep-learning-based computer-aided diagnosis accuracy.前列腺癌诊断的改进:通过放大扩散加权成像提高前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分可增强基于深度学习的计算机辅助诊断准确性。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):2132-2145. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1263. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
Comparison of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient parameters with prostate imaging reporting and data system V2 assessment for detection of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer.比较定量表观扩散系数参数与前列腺影像报告和数据系统 V2 评估在检测临床显著外周带前列腺癌中的应用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 May;43(5):1237-1244. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1297-y.
3
Diffusivity of intraorbital lymphoma vs. inflammation: comparison of single shot turbo spin echo and multishot echo planar imaging techniques.球内淋巴瘤与炎症的扩散率:单次激发 turbo 自旋回波与多次激发回波平面成像技术的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jan;28(1):325-330. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4995-5. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
4
Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of two scoring systems.前列腺多参数磁共振成像:两种评分系统的诊断性能及阅片者间一致性
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20151056. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20151056. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
5
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cancer: Reported apparent diffusion coefficients, in-vitro and in-vivo reproducibility.癌症中的扩散加权磁共振成像:报告的表观扩散系数、体外和体内再现性
World J Radiol. 2016 Jan 28;8(1):21-49. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i1.21.
6
Pitfalls and Limitations of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Urinary Bladder Cancer.扩散加权磁共振成像在膀胱癌诊断中的陷阱与局限性
Transl Oncol. 2015 Jun;8(3):217-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.04.003.
7
Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient values as predictor of aggressiveness in peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison with Gleason score.评估表观扩散系数值作为外周带前列腺癌侵袭性预测指标:与 Gleason 评分的比较
ISRN Radiol. 2014 Feb 9;2014:263417. doi: 10.1155/2014/263417. eCollection 2014.
8
Abnormal findings on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging predict subsequent biopsy upgrade in patients with low risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.多参数前列腺磁共振成像的异常结果可预测接受主动监测的低风险前列腺癌患者后续活检升级情况。
Abdom Imaging. 2014 Oct;39(5):1027-35. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0136-7.
9
Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer evaluation.弥散加权磁共振成像在前列腺癌评估中的作用。
Radiol Med. 2012 Dec;117(8):1429-40. doi: 10.1007/s11547-012-0832-8. Epub 2012 May 14.
10
Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping and spectroscopy in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中的扩散加权成像及表观扩散系数图与波谱分析
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Dec;19(6):261-72. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3181aa6b50.