Zhou Haibo, Chen Jianwei, Rissanen Tiina H, Korrick Susan A, Hu Howard, Salonen Jukka T, Longnecker Matthew P
Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7420, USA.
Epidemiology. 2007 Jul;18(4):461-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31806462d3.
To characterize the relation between an exposure and a continuous outcome, the sampling of subjects can be done much as it is in a case-control study, such that the sample is enriched with subjects who are especially informative. In an outcome-dependent sampling design, observations made on a judiciously chosen subset of the base population can provide nearly the same statistical efficiency as observing the entire base population. Reaping the benefits of such sampling, however, requires use of an analysis that accounts for the outcome-dependent sampling. In this report, we examine the statistical efficiency of a plain random sample analyzed with standard methods, compared with that of data collected with outcome-dependent sampling and analyzed by either of 2 appropriate methods. In addition, 3 real datasets were analyzed using an outcome-dependent sampling approach. The results demonstrate the improved statistical efficiency obtained by using an outcome-dependent sampling, and its applicability in a wide range of settings. This design, coupled with an appropriate analysis, offers a cost-efficient approach to studying the determinants of a continuous outcome.
为了描述暴露因素与连续型结局之间的关系,受试者的抽样方式可以与病例对照研究中的抽样方式非常相似,以便样本中富含信息量大的受试者。在基于结局的抽样设计中,对经过审慎选择的基础人群子集进行观察,其统计效率几乎与观察整个基础人群相同。然而,要获得这种抽样的益处,需要使用一种考虑了基于结局抽样的分析方法。在本报告中,我们将用标准方法分析的简单随机样本的统计效率,与采用基于结局抽样收集并通过两种合适方法之一进行分析的数据的统计效率进行了比较。此外,还使用基于结局的抽样方法对3个真实数据集进行了分析。结果表明,采用基于结局的抽样可提高统计效率,且其在广泛的环境中均适用。这种设计,再加上适当的分析方法,为研究连续型结局的决定因素提供了一种经济高效的方法。