Prisk G Kim, Yamada Kei, Henderson A Cortney, Arai Tatsuya J, Levin David L, Buxton Richard B, Hopkins Susan R
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0931, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Sep;103(3):883-94. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00292.2007. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
Prone posture increases cardiac output and improves pulmonary gas exchange. We hypothesized that, in the supine posture, greater compression of dependent lung limits regional blood flow. To test this, MRI-based measures of regional lung density, MRI arterial spin labeling quantification of pulmonary perfusion, and density-normalized perfusion were made in six healthy subjects. Measurements were made in both the prone and supine posture at functional residual capacity. Data were acquired in three nonoverlapping 15-mm sagittal slices covering most of the right lung: central, middle, and lateral, which were further divided into vertical zones: anterior, intermediate, and posterior. The density of the entire lung was not different between prone and supine, but the increase in lung density in the anterior lung with prone posture was less than the decrease in the posterior lung (change: +0.07 g/cm(3) anterior, -0.11 posterior; P < 0.0001), indicating greater compression of dependent lung in supine posture, principally in the central lung slice (P < 0.0001). Overall, density-normalized perfusion was significantly greater in prone posture (7.9 +/- 3.6 ml.min(-1).g(-1) prone, 5.1 +/- 1.8 supine, a 55% increase; P < 0.05) and showed the largest increase in the posterior lung as it became nondependent (change: +71% posterior, +58% intermediate, +31% anterior; P = 0.08), most marked in the central lung slice (P < 0.05). These data indicate that central posterior portions of the lung are more compressed in the supine posture, likely by the heart and adjacent structures, than are central anterior portions in the prone and that this limits regional perfusion in the supine posture.
俯卧位可增加心输出量并改善肺气体交换。我们推测,在仰卧位时,下垂肺受到的更大压迫会限制局部血流。为了验证这一点,我们对6名健康受试者进行了基于MRI的局部肺密度测量、MRI动脉自旋标记法对肺灌注的定量分析以及密度标准化灌注分析。在功能残气量时分别测量了俯卧位和仰卧位的相关数据。数据采集于覆盖右肺大部分区域的三个不重叠的15毫米矢状切片:中央、中间和外侧切片,这些切片又进一步分为垂直区域:前部、中部和后部。俯卧位和仰卧位时全肺密度无差异,但俯卧位时前肺肺密度的增加小于后肺肺密度的降低(变化:前部增加0.07 g/cm³,后部降低0.11 g/cm³;P<0.0001),表明仰卧位时下垂肺受到更大压迫,主要在中央肺切片(P<0.0001)。总体而言,密度标准化灌注在俯卧位时显著更高(俯卧位时为7.9±3.6 ml·min⁻¹·g⁻¹,仰卧位时为5.1±1.8,增加55%;P<0.05),并且后肺在变为非下垂部位时增加幅度最大(变化:后部增加71%,中部增加58%,前部增加31%;P = 0.08),在中央肺切片最为明显(P<0.05)。这些数据表明,与俯卧位时中央前部相比,仰卧位时肺的中央后部受到心脏和相邻结构的压迫更大,这限制了仰卧位时的局部灌注。