Saka Görkem, Kreke Jennifer E, Schaefer Andrew J, Chang Chung-Chou H, Roberts Mark S, Angus Derek C
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 OHara St, 3700 Benedum Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Crit Care. 2007;11(3):R65. doi: 10.1186/cc5942.
Sepsis is the leading cause of death in critically ill patients and often affects individuals with community-acquired pneumonia. To overcome the limitations of earlier mathematical models used to describe sepsis and predict outcomes, we designed an empirically based Monte Carlo model that simulates the progression of sepsis in hospitalized patients over a 30-day period.
The model simulates changing health over time, as represented by the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, as a function of a patient's previous health state and length of hospital stay. We used data from patients enrolled in the GenIMS (Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis) study to calibrate the model, and tested the model's ability to predict deaths, discharges, and daily SOFA scores over time using different algorithms to estimate the natural history of sepsis. We evaluated the stability of the methods using bootstrap sampling techniques.
Of the 1,888 patients originally enrolled, most were elderly (mean age 67.77 years) and white (80.72%). About half (47.98%) were female. Most were relatively ill, with a mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score of 56 and Pneumonia Severity Index score of 73.5. The model's estimates of the daily pattern of deaths, discharges, and SOFA scores over time were not statistically different from the actual pattern when information about how long patients had been ill was included in the model (P = 0.91 to 0.98 for discharges; P = 0.26 to 0.68 for deaths). However, model estimates of these patterns were different from the actual pattern when the model did not include data on the duration of illness (P < 0.001 for discharges; P = 0.001 to 0.040 for deaths). Model results were stable to bootstrap validation.
An empiric simulation model of sepsis can predict complex longitudinal patterns in the progression of sepsis, most accurately by models that contain data representing both organ-system levels of and duration of illness. This work supports the incorporation into mathematical models of disease of the clinical intuition that the history of disease in an individual matters, and represents an advance over several prior simulation models that assume a constant rate of disease progression.
脓毒症是重症患者死亡的主要原因,常影响社区获得性肺炎患者。为克服早期用于描述脓毒症和预测预后的数学模型的局限性,我们设计了一个基于经验的蒙特卡罗模型,该模型模拟住院患者30天内脓毒症的进展情况。
该模型模拟随时间变化的健康状况,用脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估(SOFA)评分表示,它是患者先前健康状态和住院时间的函数。我们使用脓毒症遗传和炎症标志物(GenIMS)研究中纳入患者的数据来校准模型,并使用不同算法估计脓毒症的自然病程,测试模型预测死亡、出院情况以及随时间变化的每日SOFA评分的能力。我们使用自助抽样技术评估方法的稳定性。
在最初纳入的1888例患者中,大多数为老年人(平均年龄67.77岁)且为白人(80.72%)。约一半(47.98%)为女性。大多数患者病情相对较重,急性生理与慢性健康状况评估III(APACHE III)评分平均为56分,肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)评分为73.5分。当模型纳入患者患病时长信息时,模型对死亡、出院情况以及随时间变化的每日SOFA评分的估计模式与实际模式在统计学上无差异(出院情况P = 0.91至0.98;死亡情况P = 0.26至0.68)。然而,当模型未纳入疾病持续时间数据时,这些模式的模型估计与实际模式不同(出院情况P < 0.001;死亡情况P = 0.001至0.040)。模型结果经自助验证具有稳定性。
脓毒症的经验模拟模型可以预测脓毒症进展过程中复杂的纵向模式,包含疾病器官系统水平和持续时间数据的模型预测最为准确。这项工作支持将临床直觉(即个体疾病史很重要)纳入疾病数学模型,并且相较于几个假设疾病进展速率恒定的先前模拟模型有了进步。