Nicosia Mark A, Robbins JoAnne
Institute on Aging, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Dysphagia. 2007 Oct;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1007/s00455-007-9086-3.
Although dietary modification is a common treatment strategy used to manage dysphagic patients who aspirate thin liquids, there are no standard definitions for thickened liquid preparation. This lack of standardization leads to variability in practice and points to the need for a simple tool for clinicians to assess thickened liquid consistency. The current study analyzed the utility of the Line Spread Test (LST) in this regard. Twenty-six liquids (10 powder-thickened "nectar" juices, 10 powder-thickened "honey" juices, and 6 barium mixtures) were assessed using both a viscometer for objective measurement of viscosity and the LST. Whereas the LST was able to separate the juices into nectar and honey categories, it was not able to separate barium mixtures into these categories nor compare barium to juices. Furthermore, the LST was not predictive of viscosity. Thus, the results of the current study suggest that the LST may be useful in the broad categorization of fluids into therapeutically significant groupings but that it cannot be used more specifically to measure fluid viscosity. Further studies of this and other tools are necessary to identify inexpensive practical tools for quantification of thickened liquid consistency.
尽管饮食调整是用于管理吞咽困难且易吸入稀液体患者的常见治疗策略,但对于增稠液体的制备尚无标准定义。这种缺乏标准化的情况导致实践中的差异,并表明需要一种简单工具供临床医生评估增稠液体的稠度。本研究分析了线扩散试验(LST)在这方面的效用。使用粘度计进行粘度的客观测量以及线扩散试验对26种液体(10种粉末增稠的“花蜜”状果汁、10种粉末增稠的“蜂蜜”状果汁和6种钡混合物)进行了评估。虽然线扩散试验能够将果汁分为花蜜类和蜂蜜类,但它无法将钡混合物分为这些类别,也无法将钡与果汁进行比较。此外,线扩散试验无法预测粘度。因此,本研究结果表明,线扩散试验可能有助于将液体广泛分类为具有治疗意义的组别,但不能更具体地用于测量液体粘度。有必要对该工具及其他工具进行进一步研究,以确定用于量化增稠液体稠度的廉价实用工具。