• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

张力性和无能量机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术联合神经血管束筋膜间分离术

Tension and energy-free robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with interfascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles.

作者信息

Mattei Agostino, Naspro Richard, Annino Filippo, Burke Daniel, Guida Romolo, Gaston Richard

机构信息

Service d'Urologie, Clinique Saint Augustin, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2007 Sep;52(3):687-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.029. Epub 2007 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.029
PMID:17587488
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess overall safety, histopathological outcomes, and early functional results after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) with a new lateral approach for the interfascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles without tension and any use of electrocautery.

METHODS

Between April and September 2006, 100 consecutive patients with organ-confined prostate cancer (age < 70 yr, PSA < or = 10 microg/dl, Gleason score < or = 7, and IIEF > or = 17) underwent RALP by the same senior surgeon. Pre-, intra-, and perioperative data were recorded. The operative technique is described step by step. Patients were assessed at the 4-mo follow-up.

RESULTS

RALP was successfully completed in all patients. Neither blood transfusions nor reintervention were necessary. One week following catheter removal, complete early urinary continence was achieved in 80% of patients, and spontaneous erections or penile tumescence was reported by 46 patients. Positive surgical margins were 12.1% in the pT2 group and 29% in the pT3 group. Ninety-three patients were available for analysis at the 4-mo follow-up. Of them, 92.4% were completely continent, 5.4% used 1 pad a day, and 2.2% used 2 or more pads a day. Concerning the IIEF-EF domain score, 64.5% of the patients reported a total score > or = 17, and 17.2% of them scored > or = 26.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel approach described for RALP is safe and allows excellent dissection. It maintains good margin status and provides encouraging early continence and erectile functional results in selected patients. Long-term follow-up is necessary to assess the impact of this approach on oncological outcome.

摘要

目的

评估采用一种新的外侧入路进行无张力且不使用电灼的神经血管束筋膜间分离的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)后的总体安全性、组织病理学结果和早期功能结果。

方法

2006年4月至9月期间,100例连续的器官局限性前列腺癌患者(年龄<70岁,PSA≤10μg/dl,Gleason评分≤7,国际勃起功能指数[IIEF]≥17)由同一位资深外科医生进行RALP手术。记录术前、术中及围手术期数据。逐步描述手术技术。在4个月随访时对患者进行评估。

结果

所有患者均成功完成RALP手术。无需输血或再次干预。拔除导尿管1周后,80%的患者实现了早期完全尿控,46例患者报告有自发勃起或阴茎勃起。pT2组手术切缘阳性率为12.1%,pT3组为29%。93例患者在4个月随访时可进行分析。其中,92.4%的患者完全控尿,5.4%的患者每天使用1片尿垫,2.2%的患者每天使用2片或更多尿垫。关于IIEF-勃起功能(EF)领域评分,64.5%的患者报告总分≥17,其中17.2%的患者评分≥26。

结论

所描述的RALP新方法是安全的,且能实现出色的分离。它能保持良好的切缘状态,并在部分患者中提供令人鼓舞的早期尿控和勃起功能结果。需要长期随访来评估该方法对肿瘤学结局的影响。

相似文献

1
Tension and energy-free robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with interfascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles.张力性和无能量机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术联合神经血管束筋膜间分离术
Eur Urol. 2007 Sep;52(3):687-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.029. Epub 2007 Jun 8.
2
Editorial comment on: tension and energy-free robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with interfascial dissection of the neurovascular bundle.关于“筋膜间神经血管束解剖的无张力及免能量机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术”的编者按
Eur Urol. 2007 Sep;52(3):694-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.030.
3
Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术时保留解剖学膀胱颈:技术描述和结果。
Eur Urol. 2009 Dec;56(6):972-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.017. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
4
[RALP: comparison of the oncological and functional outcomes of the intrafascial and the interfascial approaches].[机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:筋膜内与筋膜间入路的肿瘤学及功能学结果比较]
Prog Urol. 2015 Jan;25(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.08.237. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
5
Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.根治性前列腺切除术后神经血管束的保留程度与术后 1 年的尿控情况。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):559-68. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
6
Continence outcomes after bladder neck preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中保留膀胱颈后的控尿结果。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24(6):364-71. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2015.1027711. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
7
Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.微创根治性前列腺切除术:从单纯腹腔镜手术向机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的转变。
Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct;64(8):823-9.
8
Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术细节、肿瘤学及功能结果:400例患者,至少随访12个月
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1358-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.035. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
9
Radical prostatectomy: initial experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures at a large university hospital.根治性前列腺切除术:大型大学医院机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的初步经验。
Scand J Urol. 2014 Jun;48(3):252-8. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.868514. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
10
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial experience and short-term outcomes of single-port extraperitoneal transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a two-center study.单孔腹膜外经膀胱机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的初步经验及短期疗效:一项双中心研究
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Jun 30;12(6):989-1001. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-98.
2
Anterior Sphincter-sparing Suturing of the Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中膀胱尿道吻合术的前括约肌保留缝合术
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 May 5;52:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.007. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Urinary Continence Recovery after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy without Anterior or Posterior Reconstruction: Experience from a Tertiary Referral Center.
机器人根治性前列腺切除术后无前后部重建的尿失禁恢复:来自三级转诊中心的经验
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1358. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041358.
4
Different Nerve-Sparing Techniques during Radical Prostatectomy and Their Impact on Functional Outcomes.根治性前列腺切除术中不同的神经保留技术及其对功能结局的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;14(7):1601. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071601.
5
Transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and surgical outcomes.经膀胱机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:初步经验和手术结果。
BJU Int. 2020 Aug;126(2):300-308. doi: 10.1111/bju.15111. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Influence of multinerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the recovery of erection in Japanese patients.保留多神经的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对日本患者勃起功能恢复的影响。
Reprod Med Biol. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):36-43. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12063. eCollection 2018 Jan.
7
Nerve Bundle Hydrodissection and Sexual Function after Robot Prostatectomy.机器人前列腺切除术后神经束水分离与性功能
JSLS. 2017 Oct-Dec;21(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00068.
8
Double primary tumor of the stomach and the prostate managed robotically simultaneously.机器人辅助下同时处理胃和前列腺双原发肿瘤
J Robot Surg. 2010 May;4(1):53-5. doi: 10.1007/s11701-010-0177-z. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
9
Effect of Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy on Urinary Continence in Patients With Preoperative Erectile Dysfunction.保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术对术前勃起功能障碍患者尿失禁的影响。
Int Neurourol J. 2016 Mar;20(1):69-74. doi: 10.5213/inj.1630428.214. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
10
Prospective comparison of one year follow-up outcomes for the open complete intrafascial retropubic versus interfascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.开放性完全筋膜内耻骨后与筋膜间保留神经根治性前列腺切除术一年随访结果的前瞻性比较。
Springerplus. 2014 Jul 1;3:335. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-335. eCollection 2014.