Jacobson Bert H, Wallace Tia J, Smith Doug B, Kolb Tanner
School of Applied Health and Educational Psychology, Applied Musculoskeletal and Human Physiology Research Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2008 Mar;39(2):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
The purpose of this study was to compare sleep comfort and quality between personal and new bedding systems. A convenience sample (women, n=33; men, n=29) with no clinical history of disturbed sleep participated in the study. Subjects recorded back and shoulder pain, sleep quality, comfort, and efficiency for 28 days each in their personal beds (pre) and in new medium-firm bedding systems (post). Repeated measures ANOVAs revealed significant improvement between pre- and post-test means for all dependent variables. Furthermore, reduction of pain and stiffness and improvement of sleep comfort and quality became more prominent over time. No significant differences were found for the groupings of age, weight, height, or body mass index. It was found that for the cheapest category of beds, lower back pain was significantly (p<0.01) more prominent than for the medium and higher priced beds. Average bed age was 9.5yrs. It was concluded that new bedding systems can significantly improve selected sleep variables and that continuous sleep quality may be dependent on timely replacement of bedding systems.
本研究的目的是比较个人床上用品系统和新床上用品系统之间的睡眠舒适度和质量。一个便利样本(女性,n = 33;男性,n = 29),无睡眠障碍临床病史,参与了本研究。受试者在其个人床上(前)和新的中等硬度床上用品系统(后)分别记录了28天的背部和肩部疼痛、睡眠质量、舒适度和效率。重复测量方差分析显示,所有因变量在测试前和测试后的均值之间有显著改善。此外,随着时间的推移,疼痛和僵硬的减轻以及睡眠舒适度和质量的改善变得更加明显。在年龄、体重、身高或体重指数分组中未发现显著差异。结果发现,对于最便宜的床类,下背部疼痛比中等价格和高价格的床显著更突出(p<0.01)。平均床龄为9.5年。得出的结论是,新的床上用品系统可以显著改善选定的睡眠变量,并且持续的睡眠质量可能取决于床上用品系统的及时更换。