Buse John B, Bigger J Thomas, Byington Robert P, Cooper Lawton S, Cushman William C, Friedewald William T, Genuth Saul, Gerstein Hertzel C, Ginsberg Henry N, Goff David C, Grimm Richard H, Margolis Karen L, Probstfield Jeffrey L, Simons-Morton Denise G, Sullivan Mark D
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7172, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 18;99(12A):21i-33i. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
Most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus develop cardiovascular disease (CVD), with substantial loss of life expectancy. Nonfatal CVD contributes greatly to excess healthcare costs and decreased quality of life in patients with diabetes. The current epidemic of obesity has raised expectations that CVD associated with type 2 diabetes will become an even greater public health challenge. Despite the importance of this health problem, there is a lack of definitive data on the effects of the intensive control of glycemia and other CVD risk factors on CVD event rates in patients with type 2 diabetes. The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial is a randomized, multicenter, double 2 x 2 factorial design study involving 10,251 middle-aged and older participants with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk for CVD events because of existing CVD or additional risk factors. ACCORD is testing the effects of 3 medical treatment strategies to reduce CVD morbidity and mortality. All participants are in the glycemia trial, which is testing the hypothesis that a therapeutic strategy that targets a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of <6.0% will reduce the rate of CVD events more than a strategy that targets an HbA1c level of 7.0%-7.9%. The lipid trial includes 5,518 of the participants, who receive either fenofibrate or placebo in a double-masked fashion to test the hypothesis of whether, in the context of good glycemic control, a therapeutic strategy that uses a fibrate to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lower triglyceride levels together with a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol will reduce the rate of CVD events compared with a strategy that uses a statin plus a placebo. The blood pressure trial includes the remaining 4,733 participants and tests the hypothesis that a therapeutic strategy that targets a systolic blood pressure of <120 mm Hg in the context of good glycemic control will reduce the rate of CVD events compared with a strategy that targets a systolic blood pressure of <140 mm Hg. The primary outcome measure for all 3 research questions is the first occurrence of a major CVD event, specifically nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Upon the expected completion of participant follow-up in 2009, the ACCORD trial should document for the first time the benefits and risks of intensive glucose control, intensive blood pressure control, and the combination of fibrate and statin drugs in managing blood lipids in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.
大多数2型糖尿病患者会发展为心血管疾病(CVD),预期寿命会大幅缩短。非致死性CVD极大地增加了医疗费用,并降低了糖尿病患者的生活质量。当前肥胖症的流行使得人们预期,与2型糖尿病相关的CVD将成为一个更大的公共卫生挑战。尽管这个健康问题很重要,但关于强化血糖控制及其他CVD危险因素对2型糖尿病患者CVD事件发生率的影响,仍缺乏确凿的数据。糖尿病心血管风险控制行动(ACCORD)试验是一项随机、多中心、双2×2析因设计研究,涉及10251名中老年2型糖尿病患者,这些患者因已患CVD或存在其他危险因素而具有较高的CVD事件风险。ACCORD正在测试3种医学治疗策略对降低CVD发病率和死亡率的效果。所有参与者都参加了血糖试验,该试验检验的假设是,将糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平控制在<6.0%的治疗策略,比将HbA1c水平控制在7.0%-7.9%的策略能更多地降低CVD事件发生率。血脂试验包括5518名参与者,他们以双盲方式接受非诺贝特或安慰剂治疗,以检验在血糖控制良好的情况下,使用贝特类药物升高高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和降低甘油三酯水平并联合3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶抑制剂(他汀类药物)降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的治疗策略,与使用他汀类药物加安慰剂的策略相比,是否能降低CVD事件发生率。血压试验包括其余4733名参与者,检验的假设是,在血糖控制良好的情况下,将收缩压控制在<120 mmHg的治疗策略,与将收缩压控制在<140 mmHg的策略相比,是否能降低CVD事件发生率。所有这3个研究问题的主要结局指标都是首次发生主要CVD事件,具体为非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性中风或心血管死亡。预计在2009年完成对参与者的随访后,ACCORD试验将首次记录强化血糖控制、强化血压控制以及在高危2型糖尿病患者中联合使用贝特类和他汀类药物管理血脂的益处和风险。