Liu Youcheng, Bello Dhimiter, Sparer Judy A, Stowe Meredith H, Gore Rebecca J, Woskie Susan R, Cullen Mark R, Redlich Carrie A
Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2007 Jul;51(5):429-39. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mem021. Epub 2007 Jun 30.
Although respiratory exposures have been the primary concern with isocyanates, skin exposure also can occur and may contribute to sensitization and asthma. Methodologies to assess isocyanate skin exposure in the workplace are limited and skin exposure data scarce. The goals of this study were (i) to evaluate and validate the isocyanate colorimetric indicators against a quantitative assay, (ii) to evaluate the extent of isocyanate surface contamination and skin exposure among auto body shop workers and (iii) to evaluate isocyanate skin exposure determinants.
The colorimetric indicators were compared with a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) quantitative assay based on the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Method 5525 using paired laboratory sampling. The colorimetric indicators were then used to assess surface contamination and skin exposure to aliphatic isocyanates in 35 auto body shops and 124 workers as part of an epidemiologic study. The positive sample rate was calculated for various surfaces, body parts and tasks. The color intensity of the colorimetric indicators was rated on a scale 0 (yellow color) to 5 (deep red). Side-by-side comparisons of the qualitative method with the quantitative HPLC assay were also performed in the field using paired samples.
Laboratory and field evaluation validated use of the colorimetric indicators. The rate of positive surface samples for isocyanates was 46% (n = 145/313). Thirty-four percent (73/216) of samples were positive for unprotected skin and 20% (n = 22/111) for skin under latex gloves. The highest positive rate observed on skin samples was obtained after paint mixing and spraying tasks. The colorimetric indicators were highly specific for isocyanates, but false negatives occurred when compared with the more sensitive HPLC quantitative assay. The presence of surface contamination and the performance of paint-related tasks were the major determinants of isocyanate skin exposure.
This study documents extensive surface contamination and skin exposure, including under gloves, to aliphatic polyisocyanates during painting and paint mixing tasks in auto body shop workers. Contaminated surfaces and aerosol deposition during spray painting may both contribute to skin exposure. The colorimetric indicator is a quick, practical and low-cost, but not highly sensitive, industrial hygiene tool to detect isocyanate surface contamination and skin exposures following the use of isocyanate-containing products.
尽管呼吸道暴露一直是异氰酸酯的主要关注点,但皮肤暴露也可能发生,并可能导致致敏和哮喘。评估工作场所异氰酸酯皮肤暴露的方法有限,且皮肤暴露数据稀缺。本研究的目标是:(i)针对定量检测方法评估和验证异氰酸酯比色指示剂;(ii)评估汽车车身修理店工人中异氰酸酯表面污染和皮肤暴露的程度;(iii)评估异氰酸酯皮肤暴露的决定因素。
基于美国国家职业安全与健康研究所方法5525,采用配对实验室采样,将比色指示剂与高效液相色谱(HPLC)定量检测方法进行比较。作为一项流行病学研究的一部分,随后使用比色指示剂评估35家汽车车身修理店和124名工人中脂肪族异氰酸酯的表面污染和皮肤暴露情况。计算各种表面、身体部位和任务的阳性样本率。比色指示剂的颜色强度按0(黄色)至5(深红色)进行评分。还在现场使用配对样本对定性方法与定量HPLC检测进行了并排比较。
实验室和现场评估验证了比色指示剂的使用。异氰酸酯表面样本的阳性率为46%(n = 145/313)。34%(73/216)的未防护皮肤样本呈阳性,20%(n = 22/111)戴乳胶手套的皮肤样本呈阳性。在油漆混合和喷涂任务后,皮肤样本的阳性率最高。比色指示剂对异氰酸酯具有高度特异性,但与更灵敏的HPLC定量检测方法相比会出现假阴性。表面污染的存在以及与油漆相关任务的执行情况是异氰酸酯皮肤暴露的主要决定因素。
本研究记录了汽车车身修理店工人在喷漆和油漆混合任务期间,包括手套下,广泛存在脂肪族多异氰酸酯的表面污染和皮肤暴露情况。喷漆过程中的污染表面和气溶胶沉积都可能导致皮肤暴露。比色指示剂是一种快速、实用且低成本的工业卫生工具,但灵敏度不高,用于检测使用含异氰酸酯产品后异氰酸酯的表面污染和皮肤暴露情况。