Simons F Estelle R, Frew Anthony J, Ansotegui Ignacio J, Bochner Bruce S, Golden David B K, Finkelman Fred D, Leung Donald Y M, Lotvall Jan, Marone Gianni, Metcalfe Dean D, Müller Ulrich, Rosenwasser Lanny J, Sampson Hugh A, Schwartz Lawrence B, van Hage Marianne, Walls Andrew F
Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada, and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Brighton General Hospital, Belfast, UK.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Jul;120(1 Suppl):S2-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.05.001.
Risk assessment of individuals with anaphylaxis is currently hampered by lack of (1) an optimal and readily available laboratory test to confirm the clinical diagnosis of an anaphylaxis episode and (2) an optimal method of distinguishing allergen-sensitized individuals who are clinically tolerant from those at risk for anaphylaxis episodes after exposure to the relevant allergen. Our objectives were to review the effector mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of anaphylaxis; to explore the possibility of developing an optimal laboratory test to confirm the diagnosis of an anaphylaxis episode, and the possibility of improving methods to distinguish allergen sensitization from clinical reactivity; and to develop a research agenda for risk assessment in anaphylaxis. Researchers from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology held a PRACTALL (Practical Allergy) meeting to discuss these objectives. New approaches being investigated to support the clinical diagnosis of anaphylaxis include serial measurements of total tryptase in serum during an anaphylaxis episode, and measurement of baseline total tryptase levels after the episode. Greater availability of the test for mature beta-tryptase, a more specific mast cell activation marker for anaphylaxis than total tryptase, is needed. Measurement of chymase, mast cell carboxypeptidase A3, platelet-activating factor, and other mast cell products may prove to be useful. Consideration should be given to measuring a panel of mediators from mast cells and basophils. New approaches being investigated to help distinguish sensitized individuals at minimum or no risk from those at increased risk of developing anaphylaxis include measurement of the ratio of allergen-specific IgE to total IgE, determination of IgE directed at specific allergenic epitopes, measurement of basophil activation markers by using flow cytometry, and assessment of allergen-specific cytokine responses. Algorithms have been developed for risk assessment of individuals with anaphylaxis, along with a research agenda for studies that could lead to an improved ability to confirm the clinical diagnosis of anaphylaxis and to identify allergen-sensitized individuals who are at increased risk of anaphylaxis.
目前,由于缺乏以下两点,个体过敏反应的风险评估受到了阻碍:(1)一种优化且易于获得的实验室检测方法来确诊过敏反应发作的临床诊断;(2)一种优化方法来区分临床耐受的过敏原致敏个体与接触相关过敏原后有过敏反应发作风险的个体。我们的目标是回顾过敏反应病理生理学中涉及的效应机制;探索开发一种优化的实验室检测方法以确诊过敏反应发作的可能性,以及改进区分过敏原致敏与临床反应性方法的可能性;并制定过敏反应风险评估的研究议程。来自美国过敏、哮喘与免疫学会以及欧洲变态反应学与临床免疫学会的研究人员召开了一次PRACTALL(实用过敏)会议来讨论这些目标。正在研究的支持过敏反应临床诊断的新方法包括在过敏反应发作期间对血清中总类胰蛋白酶进行系列测量,以及在发作后测量基线总类胰蛋白酶水平。需要更广泛地提供成熟β-类胰蛋白酶检测,它是一种比总类胰蛋白酶更特异的过敏反应肥大细胞激活标志物。测量糜酶、肥大细胞羧肽酶A3、血小板活化因子和其他肥大细胞产物可能会被证明是有用的。应考虑测量一组来自肥大细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞的介质。正在研究的帮助区分最低或无风险的致敏个体与发生过敏反应风险增加的个体的新方法包括测量过敏原特异性IgE与总IgE的比值、测定针对特定过敏原表位的IgE、使用流式细胞术测量嗜碱性粒细胞激活标志物以及评估过敏原特异性细胞因子反应。已经开发了用于过敏反应个体风险评估的算法,以及一个研究议程,用于开展可能提高确诊过敏反应临床诊断能力和识别过敏反应风险增加的过敏原致敏个体的研究。