Ducos P, Berode M, Francin J M, Arnoux C, Lefèvre C
Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité, Avenue de Bourgogne, 54501 Vandoeuvre Cedex, France.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Jan;81(3):273-84. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0210-3. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
Biomonitoring of solvents using the unchanged substance in urine as exposure indicator is still relatively scarce due to some discrepancies between the results reported in the literature. Based on the assessment of toluene exposure, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of some steps likely to bias the results and to measure urinary toluene both in volunteers experimentally exposed and in workers of rotogravure factories.
Static headspace was used for toluene analysis. o-Cresol was also measured for comparison. Urine collection, storage and conservation conditions were studied to evaluate possible loss or contamination of toluene in controlled situations applied to six volunteers in an exposure chamber according to four scenarios with exposure at stable levels from 10 to 50 ppm. Kinetics of elimination of toluene were determined over 24 h. A field study was then carried out in a total of 29 workers from two rotogravure printing facilities.
Potential contamination during urine collection in the field is confirmed to be a real problem but technical precautions for sampling, storage and analysis can be easily followed to control the situation. In the volunteers at rest, urinary toluene showed a rapid increase after 2 h with a steady level after about 3 h. At 47.1 ppm the mean cumulated excretion was about 0.005% of the amount of the toluene ventilated. Correlation between the toluene levels in air and in end of exposure urinary sample was excellent (r = 0.965). In the field study, the median personal exposure to toluene was 32 ppm (range 3.6-148). According to the correlations between environmental and biological monitoring data, the post-shift urinary toluene (r = 0.921) and o-cresol (r = 0.873) concentrations were, respectively, 75.6 microg/l and 0.76 mg/g creatinine for 50 ppm toluene personal exposure. The corresponding urinary toluene concentration before the next shift was 11 microg/l (r = 0.883).
Urinary toluene was shown once more time a very interesting surrogate to o-cresol and could be recommended as a biomarker of choice for solvent exposure.
由于文献报道的结果存在一些差异,使用尿液中未变化的物质作为暴露指标对溶剂进行生物监测的情况仍然相对较少。基于对甲苯暴露的评估,本研究的目的是评估一些可能使结果产生偏差的步骤的影响,并测量实验暴露志愿者和凹版印刷厂工人的尿甲苯含量。
采用静态顶空法分析甲苯。同时测量邻甲酚用于比较。研究了尿液收集、储存和保存条件,以评估在暴露室中应用于六名志愿者的受控情况下甲苯可能的损失或污染,根据四种情景,暴露水平稳定在10至50 ppm。在24小时内测定甲苯的消除动力学。然后对两家凹版印刷工厂的共29名工人进行了现场研究。
现场尿液收集过程中的潜在污染被证实是一个实际问题,但采样、储存和分析的技术预防措施很容易遵循以控制这种情况。在休息的志愿者中,尿甲苯在2小时后迅速增加,约3小时后达到稳定水平。在47.1 ppm时,平均累积排泄量约为通风甲苯量的0.005%。空气和暴露结束时尿液样本中的甲苯水平之间的相关性非常好(r = 0.965)。在现场研究中,个人甲苯暴露的中位数为32 ppm(范围3.6 - 148)。根据环境和生物监测数据之间的相关性,对于个人甲苯暴露50 ppm,轮班后尿甲苯(r = 0.921)和邻甲酚(r = 0.873)浓度分别为75.6 μg/l和0.76 mg/g肌酐。下一班前相应的尿甲苯浓度为11 μg/l(r = 0.883)。
尿甲苯再次被证明是邻甲酚的一个非常有趣的替代物,可以推荐作为溶剂暴露的首选生物标志物。