Balkhyour Mansour A, Chakroun Radhouane, Faidi Faycal
Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment and Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Al-Qunfudah Center for Scientific Research(QCSR), University College of Al-Qunfudah, Umm Al-Qura University, 21912 Al-Qunfudah, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2023 Feb;30(2):103538. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103538. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
The aim of this study was to assess the exposure to Toluene in paint industry and to evaluate the environmental and biological monitoring techniques for the assessment of occupational exposure to this aromatic hydrocarbon. In this study, personal active and passive air sampling for toluene measurements, blood and urine sampling respectively for B-Tol and HA or U-Tol analyses for eight workers from two paint and thinner production factories were collected during four successive working days. Correlations were analyzed between biological indicators and environmental toluene exposure levels. The concentration of Toluene measured in air samples ranged from 0.2 to 414.0 ppm (mean = 59.8 ppm), with high variability of atmospheric levels between activities and between days. No significant difference was found between airborne toluene concentrations measured by the two sampling methods. The correlation between air concentrations sampled by the diffusive sampling method and the biomarkers was the best for HA (r = 0.902, p < 0.01), followed by B-Tol (r = 0.820; p < 0.01), o-Cr (r = 0.691; p < 0.01) and U-Tol (r = 0.607; p < 0.05). The correlation was better between air concentrations and urinary metabolites HA and o-Cr for exposure levels higher than 50 ppm (r = 0.931; p < 0.01), and lower than 300 ppm (r = 0.827; p < 0.01), respectively. According to our results, workers in the studied industries are highly exposed to Toluene. Given the high correlation found between toluene concentrations in samples taken on dosimeters and those actively sampled on charcoal tubes, it may be assumed that both sampling methods are valuable. Despite the influencing factors, HA was found to be a reliable biological indicator for the monitoring of occupational exposure to toluene for high exposure levels. However, B-Tol seems to be an interesting alternative, since it is more specific and showed the best correlations with airborne toluene levels.
本研究的目的是评估涂料行业中甲苯的暴露情况,并评估用于评估职业性接触这种芳烃的环境和生物监测技术。在本研究中,在连续四个工作日内,分别对来自两家油漆和稀释剂生产工厂的八名工人进行了个人主动和被动空气采样以测量甲苯,以及分别采集血液和尿液样本用于β-甲苯和马尿酸(HA)或尿甲苯(U-Tol)分析。分析了生物指标与环境甲苯暴露水平之间的相关性。空气样本中测得的甲苯浓度范围为0.2至414.0 ppm(平均值=59.8 ppm),活动之间和不同日期的大气水平变化很大。两种采样方法测得的空气中甲苯浓度之间未发现显著差异。扩散采样法采集的空气浓度与生物标志物之间的相关性对于HA最佳(r = 0.902,p <0.01),其次是β-甲苯(r = 0.820; p <0.01)、邻甲酚(r = 0.691; p <0.01)和尿甲苯(r = 0.607; p <0.05)。对于高于50 ppm(r = 0.931; p <0.01)和低于300 ppm(r = 0.827; p <0.01)的暴露水平,空气浓度与尿代谢物HA和邻甲酚之间的相关性更好。根据我们的结果,所研究行业的工人高度暴露于甲苯。鉴于剂量计上采集的样本中的甲苯浓度与在活性炭管上主动采样的浓度之间存在高度相关性,可以假设这两种采样方法都是有价值的。尽管存在影响因素,但发现HA是监测高暴露水平职业性甲苯暴露的可靠生物指标。然而,β-甲苯似乎是一个有趣的替代指标,因为它更具特异性,并且与空气中甲苯水平的相关性最佳。