Waddell Charlotte, Hua Josephine M, Garland Orion M, Peters Ray DeV, McEwan Kimberley
Children's Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC.
Can J Public Health. 2007 May-Jun;98(3):166-73. doi: 10.1007/BF03403706.
At any given time, 14% of Canadian children experience clinically significant mental disorders, which frequently persist into adulthood. Canadian public policy has emphasized specialized treatment services, yet these services only reach 25% of children with disorders. Prevention programs hold potential to reduce the number of children with disorders in the population. To inform policy-making, we systematically reviewed the best available research evidence on programs for preventing conduct disorder (CD), anxiety and depression, three of the most prevalent mental disorders in children.
We systematically identified and reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on programs intended to prevent CD, anxiety and depression in children aged 0-18 years.
Fifteen RCTs met selection criteria: nine (on eight programs) for preventing CD; one for anxiety; four (on three programs) for depression; and one for all three. Ten RCTs demonstrated significant reductions in child symptom and/or diagnostic measures at follow-up. The most noteworthy programs, for CD, targeted at-risk children in the early years using parent training (PT) or child social skills training (SST); for anxiety, employed universal cognitive-behavioural training (CBT) in school-age children; and for depression, targeted at-risk school-age children, also using CBT. Effect sizes for these noteworthy programs were modest but consequential. There were few Canadian studies and few that evaluated costs.
Prevention programs are promising but replication RCTs are needed to determine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in Canadian settings. Four program types should be priorities for replication: targeted PTand child SST for preventing CD in children's early years; and universal and targeted CBTfor preventing anxiety and depression in children's school-age years. Conducting RCTs through research-policy partnerships would enable implementation in realistic settings while ensuring rigorous evaluation. Prevention merits new policy and research investments as part of a comprehensive public health strategy to improve children's mental health in the population.
在任何特定时间,14%的加拿大儿童患有具有临床意义的精神障碍,这些障碍常常会持续到成年期。加拿大的公共政策一直强调提供专门的治疗服务,但这些服务仅惠及25%的患病儿童。预防项目有可能减少人群中患有精神障碍的儿童数量。为了为政策制定提供信息,我们系统地回顾了关于预防品行障碍(CD)、焦虑和抑郁这三种儿童中最常见的精神障碍的项目的现有最佳研究证据。
我们系统地识别并回顾了旨在预防0至18岁儿童的CD、焦虑和抑郁的随机对照试验(RCT)。
15项RCT符合入选标准:9项(涉及8个项目)用于预防CD;1项用于预防焦虑;4项(涉及3个项目)用于预防抑郁;1项用于预防所有这三种障碍。10项RCT表明在随访时儿童症状和/或诊断指标有显著降低。最值得注意的预防CD的项目是在儿童早期针对高危儿童采用家长培训(PT)或儿童社交技能培训(SST);预防焦虑的项目是在学龄儿童中采用普遍的认知行为疗法(CBT);预防抑郁的项目是针对高危学龄儿童,同样采用CBT。这些值得注意的项目的效应量虽小但有重要意义。加拿大的研究很少,评估成本的研究也很少。
预防项目很有前景,但需要进行重复的RCT来确定其在加拿大环境中的有效性和成本效益。四种项目类型应作为重复研究的重点:针对儿童早期预防CD的针对性家长培训和儿童社交技能培训;以及针对学龄儿童预防焦虑和抑郁的普遍和针对性认知行为疗法。通过研究 - 政策伙伴关系开展RCT将能够在实际环境中实施,同时确保进行严格评估。作为改善人群中儿童心理健康的全面公共卫生战略的一部分,预防值得新的政策和研究投入。