• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项团体动机性访谈干预措施可减少被裁决的大学女生的饮酒行为及与酒精相关的负面后果。

A group Motivational Interviewing intervention reduces drinking and alcohol-related negative consequences in adjudicated college women.

作者信息

LaBrie Joseph W, Thompson Alysha D, Huchting Karen, Lac Andrew, Buckley Kevin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2549-62. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.014
PMID:17628347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3391164/
Abstract

College students who violate campus alcohol policies (adjudicated students) are at high risk for experiencing negative alcohol-related consequences and for undermining campus life. Further, college women may be especially at-risk due to differential intoxication effects and sexual consequences experienced mainly by female students. Research on interventions for adjudicated students, especially adjudicated females, has been limited. One hundred and fifteen college women who received a sanction for violating campus alcohol policies participated in the study. The two-hour group intervention focused on female-specific reasons for drinking and included decisional balance, goal setting and other exercises. Participants completed follow-up surveys for 12 weeks following the intervention and answered questions regarding alcohol consumption and alcohol-related negative consequences. Findings support the use of an MI-based intervention to reduce both alcohol consumption and consequences among adjudicated females. Specifically, alcohol use was reduced by 29.9% and negative consequences were reduced by 35.87% from pre-intervention to 3-month follow up. Further, the intervention appeared to successfully initiate change in the heaviest drinkers, as women who drank at risky levels reduced alcohol consumption to a greater extent than women who drank at moderate levels.

摘要

违反校园酒精政策的大学生(被裁定违规的学生)面临与酒精相关的负面后果以及破坏校园生活的高风险。此外,由于女性学生主要经历的不同程度的醉酒影响和性方面的后果,大学女生可能尤其处于风险之中。针对被裁定违规的学生,特别是被裁定违规的女生的干预措施研究一直很有限。115名因违反校园酒精政策而受到处罚的大学女生参与了这项研究。为期两小时的小组干预聚焦于女性饮酒的特定原因,并包括决策平衡、目标设定及其他练习。参与者在干预后的12周内完成了后续调查,并回答了有关饮酒量及与酒精相关的负面后果的问题。研究结果支持使用基于动机性访谈的干预措施来减少被裁定违规的女生的饮酒量及相关后果。具体而言,从干预前到3个月的随访期间,饮酒量减少了29.9%,负面后果减少了35.87%。此外,该干预措施似乎成功地促使饮酒量最大的人群发生了改变,因为处于高风险饮酒水平的女性比处于适度饮酒水平的女性在饮酒量减少方面幅度更大。

相似文献

1
A group Motivational Interviewing intervention reduces drinking and alcohol-related negative consequences in adjudicated college women.一项团体动机性访谈干预措施可减少被裁决的大学女生的饮酒行为及与酒精相关的负面后果。
Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2549-62. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
2
Brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students: comparison of face-to-face counseling and computer-delivered interventions.针对被强制要求参加的大学生的简短酒精干预:面对面咨询与计算机提供干预的比较。
Addiction. 2011 Mar;106(3):528-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03193.x. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
3
Incident-specific and individual-level moderators of brief intervention effects with mandated college students.与被强制要求参加的大学生相关的特定事件和个体层面的简短干预效果的调节变量。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Dec;25(4):616-24. doi: 10.1037/a0024508. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
4
Peer enhancement of a brief motivational intervention with mandated college students.对强制参与的大学生进行简短动机干预的同伴强化。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2007 Mar;21(1):114-9. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.1.114.
5
Predictors of short-term change after a brief alcohol intervention for mandated college drinkers.强制性大学生饮酒简短干预后短期变化的预测因素。
Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;77:152-159. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
6
When wanting to change is not enough: automatic appetitive processes moderate the effects of a brief alcohol intervention in hazardous-drinking college students.当仅仅有改变的意愿还不够时:自动的欲望过程会调节短期酒精干预对危险饮酒大学生的影响。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2012 Dec 7;7(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-7-25.
7
Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy.针对违反校园酒精政策的学生,计算机干预与面对面干预的比较
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Feb;77(1):74-87. doi: 10.1037/a0014281.
8
A Novel Approach for Streamlining Delivery of Brief Motivational Interventions to Mandated College Students: Using Group and Individual Sessions Matched to Level of Risk.一种简化向受强制要求的大学生提供简短动机干预措施的新方法:采用与风险水平相匹配的小组和个别辅导课程。
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Dec 6;52(14):1883-1891. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1318148. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
9
A campus-based motivational enhancement group intervention reduces problematic drinking in freshmen male college students.一项基于校园的动机增强小组干预措施可减少大学新生男性的问题饮酒行为。
Addict Behav. 2007 May;32(5):889-901. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.030. Epub 2006 Jul 31.
10
A randomized motivational enhancement prevention group reduces drinking and alcohol consequences in first-year college women.一个随机的动机增强预防组减少了大学一年级女生的饮酒量及酒精相关后果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Mar;22(1):149-55. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.1.149.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative analysis of how U.S. college students construct their alcohol-related content identities via social media.关于美国大学生如何通过社交媒体构建与酒精相关的内容身份的定性分析。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2025 Aug 19;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13011-025-00659-5.
2
A Short-Term Evaluation of the Eat and Exercise to Win Program for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.《智力和发育障碍成年人的“吃和运动赢”计划短期评估》
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 16;16(18):3124. doi: 10.3390/nu16183124.
3
Evaluation of a Pilot Healthy Eating and Exercise Program for Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disabilities.针对患有自闭症谱系障碍和智力障碍的年轻人的健康饮食与锻炼试点项目评估。
Adv Neurodev Disord. 2021;5(4):413-430. doi: 10.1007/s41252-021-00214-w. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
Randomized controlled trial of group motivational interviewing for veterans with substance use disorders.随机对照试验对有物质使用障碍的退伍军人进行团体动机性访谈。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jun 1;223:108716. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108716. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
5
Examining the Effects of a Brief, Group-Based Motivational Implementation Strategy on Mechanisms of Teacher Behavior Change.考察基于小组的简短激励实施策略对教师行为改变机制的影响。
Prev Sci. 2021 Aug;22(6):722-736. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01191-7. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
6
Gender Informed or Gender Ignored? Opportunities for Gender Transformative Approaches in Brief Alcohol Interventions on College Campuses.性别视角化还是性别忽视?校园简短酒精干预中性别转化方法的机会。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020396.
7
Design and feasibility testing of a novel group intervention for young women who binge drink in groups.设计并检验一种针对群体 binge drinking 的新型团体干预方法对年轻女性的适用性。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):e0193434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193434. eCollection 2018.
8
A Novel Approach for Streamlining Delivery of Brief Motivational Interventions to Mandated College Students: Using Group and Individual Sessions Matched to Level of Risk.一种简化向受强制要求的大学生提供简短动机干预措施的新方法:采用与风险水平相匹配的小组和个别辅导课程。
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Dec 6;52(14):1883-1891. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1318148. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
9
Prevention of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Current Canadian Efforts and Analysis of Gaps.预防胎儿酒精谱系障碍:加拿大当前的努力及差距分析。
Subst Abuse. 2016 May 5;10(Suppl 1):1-11. doi: 10.4137/SART.S34545. eCollection 2016.
10
Alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A meta-analytic review.针对强制入学大学生的酒精干预措施:一项元分析综述。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Jul;84(7):619-32. doi: 10.1037/a0040275. Epub 2016 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths.美国的阿片类药物滥用情况以及美国卫生与公众服务部为应对与阿片类药物相关的过量用药和死亡所采取的行动。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;29(2):133-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530.
2
Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial.针对重度饮酒大学生的简短动机干预:一项随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Oct;74(5):943-54. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.943.
3
A within-subjects validation of a group-administered timeline followback for alcohol use.团体施测的酒精使用时间线追溯法的被试内效度验证
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Mar;67(2):332-5. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.332.
4
A group-administered Timeline Followback assessment of alcohol use.一项针对酒精使用情况的团体管理时间线回溯评估。
J Stud Alcohol. 2005 Sep;66(5):693-7. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.693.
5
Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.针对被要求参加的大学生的两种简短酒精干预措施。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2005 Sep;19(3):296-302. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.3.296.
6
Mandatory alcohol intervention for alcohol-abusing college students: a systematic review.针对酗酒大学生的强制性酒精干预措施:一项系统综述
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005 Sep;29(2):147-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2005.05.007.
7
Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24: changes from 1998 to 2001.18至24岁美国大学生中与酒精相关的死亡率和发病率:1998年至2001年的变化
Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:259-79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144652.
8
Gender-specific misperceptions of college student drinking norms.大学生饮酒规范的性别特定误解。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2004 Dec;18(4):334-9. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.18.4.334.
9
Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students.在强制参与和自愿参与的大学生中预防酗酒及相关负面后果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Dec;72(6):1038-49. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1038.
10
Brief alcohol interventions with mandated or adjudicated college students.对被要求或已被裁决的大学生进行简短的酒精干预。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004 Jun;28(6):966-75. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000128231.97817.c7.