• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接从阳性血培养物进行的椎间盘药敏试验评估。

Evaluation of disc susceptibility tests performed directly from positive blood cultures.

作者信息

Tan T Y, Ng L S Y, Kwang L L

机构信息

Division of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 2008 Mar;61(3):343-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.050757. Epub 2007 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1136/jcp.2007.050757
PMID:17630402
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the accuracy of direct disc susceptibility testing performed from positive BACTEC blood culture vials, using a predetermined dilution protocol.

METHODS

Direct susceptibility testing was performed from 432 positive blood culture vials, generating 3829 antibiotic-organism results. Results were compared with those obtained by standard disc susceptibility testing according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods.

RESULTS

When results were compared with the reference method, no very major errors were detected. One (0.03%) major error and 89 (2.3%) minor errors were found. Error rates by organism group ranged from 1.3% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa to 8.2% for beta-haemolytic streptococci.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct susceptibility testing provided accurate susceptibility results for most organism-antibiotic combinations, with the exception of the beta-haemolytic streptococci.

摘要

目的

使用预先确定的稀释方案,评估从阳性BACTEC血培养瓶进行直接药敏试验的准确性。

方法

从432个阳性血培养瓶中进行直接药敏试验,得出3829个抗生素-微生物结果。根据临床实验室标准协会(CLSI)方法,将结果与通过标准纸片扩散法药敏试验获得的结果进行比较。

结果

将结果与参考方法进行比较时,未检测到非常重大的错误。发现1例(0.03%)重大错误和89例(2.3%)轻微错误。按微生物类别划分的错误率范围为,铜绿假单胞菌为1.3%,β溶血性链球菌为8.2%。

结论

除β溶血性链球菌外,直接药敏试验为大多数微生物-抗生素组合提供了准确的药敏结果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of disc susceptibility tests performed directly from positive blood cultures.直接从阳性血培养物进行的椎间盘药敏试验评估。
J Clin Pathol. 2008 Mar;61(3):343-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.050757. Epub 2007 Jul 14.
2
Comparison of three standardized disc susceptibility testing methods for colistin.三种黏菌素标准化纸片药敏试验方法的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Oct;58(4):864-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl330. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
3
Comparison of workflow and accuracy of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci by Vitek 2 and routine methods.通过Vitek 2和常规方法对肠杆菌科细菌、铜绿假单胞菌和肠球菌临床分离株进行鉴定及抗菌药物敏感性试验的工作流程和准确性比较
APMIS. 2006 Jan;114(1):43-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2006.apm_338.x.
4
Comparison of the accuracy of disk diffusion zone diameters obtained by manual zone measurements to that by automated zone measurements to determine antimicrobial susceptibility.通过手动测量抑菌圈直径与自动测量抑菌圈直径来确定抗菌药物敏感性时,二者准确性的比较。
J Microbiol Methods. 2008 Oct;75(2):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.05.020. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
5
Comparison of disk diffusion, VITEK 2, and broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test results for unusual species of Enterobacteriaceae.肠杆菌科罕见菌种的纸片扩散法、VITEK 2法和肉汤微量稀释法抗菌药敏试验结果比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb;45(2):340-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01782-06. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
6
[Comparison between Phoenix system and agar-based methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus spp].[凤凰系统与琼脂基方法用于链球菌属抗菌药物敏感性试验的比较]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2008 Sep;21(3):184-8.
7
Reevaluation of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute disk diffusion breakpoints for tetracyclines for testing Enterobacteriaceae.重新评估临床和实验室标准协会关于用于检测肠杆菌科细菌的四环素纸片扩散法断点值。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 May;45(5):1640-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00143-07. Epub 2007 Mar 14.
8
Rapid identification and susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 system using culture fluids from positive BacT/ALERT blood cultures.使用VITEK 2系统对来自阳性BacT/ALERT血培养的培养液进行快速鉴定和药敏试验。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2008 Jun;41(3):259-64.
9
[The implementation of the broth microdilution method to determine bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial agents].[采用肉汤稀释法测定细菌对抗菌药物的敏感性]
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2007 Jan-Feb;120(1-2):42-9.
10
Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae.BD Phoenix自动化微生物系统用于肠杆菌科细菌鉴定及药敏试验的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Oct;44(10):3506-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00994-06.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Value of Direct Disk Diffusion Testing from Positive Blood Cultures for Detection of Antimicrobial Nonsusceptibility.血培养阳性直接药敏试验对检测抗菌药物不敏感性的预测价值。
Microorganisms. 2025 Feb 12;13(2):398. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020398.
2
Performance evaluation of machine-assisted interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures.机器辅助解读血培养阳性革兰染色的性能评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Apr 10;62(4):e0087623. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00876-23. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
3
Rapid, Low-Complexity, Simultaneous Bacterial Group Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Performed Directly on Positive Blood Culture Bottles Using Chromogenic Agar.
采用显色琼脂直接对阳性血培养瓶进行快速、低复杂度、同时的细菌群鉴定和药敏试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Nov 14;107(6):1302-1307. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0278. Print 2022 Dec 14.
4
Evaluation of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of -, - and -Positive Blood Cultures.欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会关于 -、- 和 - 阳性血培养快速抗菌药物敏感性试验指南的评估
Microorganisms. 2021 May 13;9(5):1055. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051055.
5
Assessment of rapid direct E-test on positive blood culture for same-day antimicrobial susceptibility.快速直接 E 试验对阳性血培养物进行即时抗菌药敏评估。
Braz J Microbiol. 2019 Oct;50(4):953-959. doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00139-6. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
6
Daptomycin Pore Formation and Stoichiometry Depend on Membrane Potential of Target Membrane.达托霉素的孔形成和计量取决于靶膜的膜电位。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Dec 21;63(1). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01589-18. Print 2019 Jan.
7
Automated direct screening for resistance of Gram-negative blood cultures using the BD Kiestra WorkCell.使用 BD Kiestra WorkCell 对革兰氏阴性血培养物进行自动化直接耐药筛选。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;37(1):117-125. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3109-2. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
8
Beyond Blood Culture and Gram Stain Analysis: A Review of Molecular Techniques for the Early Detection of Bacteremia in Surgical Patients.超越血培养和革兰氏染色分析:外科患者菌血症早期检测分子技术综述
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Jun;17(3):294-302. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.099. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
9
Performance Evaluation of the Verigene Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Blood Culture Test for Direct Identification of Bacteria and Their Resistance Determinants from Positive Blood Cultures in Hong Kong.用于直接从香港阳性血培养物中鉴定细菌及其耐药决定因素的Verigene革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性血培养检测的性能评估
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 2;10(10):e0139728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139728. eCollection 2015.
10
Clinical evaluation of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel in identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood culture bottles.FilmArray血培养鉴定板对阳性血培养瓶中细菌和酵母菌的临床鉴定评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Dec;51(12):4130-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01835-13. Epub 2013 Oct 2.