Suppr超能文献

迈向急性胰腺炎亚特兰大分类的更新:新术语与废弃术语综述

Toward an update of the atlanta classification on acute pancreatitis: review of new and abandoned terms.

作者信息

Bollen Thomas L, Besselink Marc G H, van Santvoort Hjalmar C, Gooszen Hein G, van Leeuwen Maarten S

机构信息

Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pancreas. 2007 Aug;35(2):107-13. doi: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e31804fa189.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The 1992 Atlanta classification is a clinically based classification system that defines the severity and complications of acute pancreatitis. The purpose of this review was to assess whether the terms abandoned by the Atlanta classification are really discarded in the literature. The second objective was to review what new terms have appeared in the literature since the Atlanta symposium.

METHODS

We followed a Medline search strategy in review and guideline articles after the publication of the Atlanta classification. This search included the abandoned terms: "phlegmon," "infected pseudocyst," "hemorrhagic pancreatitis," and "persistent pancreatitis."

RESULTS

A total of 239 publications were reviewed, including 10 guideline articles and 42 reviews. The abandoned terms "hemorrhagic pancreatitis" and "persistent pancreatitis" are hardly encountered, in contrast, both "infected pseudocyst" and "phlegmon" are frequently used, and several authors question their abandonment. New terminology in acute pancreatitis consists of "organized pancreatic necrosis," "necroma," "extrapancreatic necrosis," and "central gland necrosis."

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates that the Atlanta classification is still not universally accepted. Several abandoned terms are frequently used, and new terms have emerged that describe manifestations in acute pancreatitis that were not specifically addressed during the Atlanta symposium.

摘要

目的

1992年亚特兰大分类法是一种基于临床的分类系统,用于定义急性胰腺炎的严重程度和并发症。本综述的目的是评估亚特兰大分类法摒弃的术语在文献中是否真的被弃用。第二个目的是回顾自亚特兰大研讨会以来文献中出现的新术语。

方法

我们在亚特兰大分类法发表后,在综述和指南文章中采用了Medline检索策略。该检索包括被摒弃的术语:“蜂窝织炎”、“感染性假性囊肿”、“出血性胰腺炎”和“持续性胰腺炎”。

结果

共审查了239篇出版物,包括10篇指南文章和42篇综述。相比之下,被摒弃的术语“出血性胰腺炎”和“持续性胰腺炎”很少遇到,而“感染性假性囊肿”和“蜂窝织炎”都经常被使用,几位作者对它们的摒弃提出质疑。急性胰腺炎的新术语包括“机化性胰腺坏死”、“坏死瘤”、“胰腺外坏死”和“中央腺坏死”。

结论

本综述表明,亚特兰大分类法仍未被普遍接受。几个被摒弃的术语经常被使用,并且出现了一些新术语,用于描述亚特兰大研讨会期间未专门涉及的急性胰腺炎表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验