• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡斯帕显微外科椎间盘切除术及其与传统标准腰椎间盘手术的比较。

The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standard lumbar disc procedure.

作者信息

Caspar W, Campbell B, Barbier D D, Kretschmmer R, Gotfried Y

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1991 Jan;28(1):78-86; discussion 86-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199101000-00013.

DOI:10.1097/00006123-199101000-00013
PMID:1994285
Abstract

The outcome in 119 patients who were operated on with a conventional standard lumbar discectomy procedure was retrospectively compared with that in 299 patients who were operated on with a microsurgical discectomy technique developed in Homburg/Saar, Federal Republic of Germany by the senior author (W.C.). All patients in this consecutive series had "virgin" lumbar radiculopathy evaluated and operated upon by two experienced surgeons at one institution. Determination of the final outcome was made objectively by an impartial third party using identical criteria for both groups, and with a patient self-evaluation form. The study looked at various pertinent aspects of the treatment course and at final outcome. The results in the microsurgical group were significantly favorable: fewer levels were explored: there was less operative blood loss and a decreased incidence of deep venous thrombosis, urinary tract infections, pulmonary emboli, and bladder catheterization; the time to full ambulation, discharge, and return to work was faster: and there was a decrease in change of occupation and a greater percentage of satisfactory final outcomes, as measured both objectively and subjectively. A description of the microsurgical technique used in this study, which differs significantly from existing microdisectomy techniques, is presented. The authors conclude that the microsurgical disectomy technique presented in this study is a safe and effective approach to the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy.

摘要

对119例行传统标准腰椎间盘切除术的患者的手术结果,与299例行由资深作者(W.C.)在德意志联邦共和国洪堡/萨尔研发的显微外科椎间盘切除术的患者的手术结果进行了回顾性比较。在这一连续系列中,所有患者均患有“原发性”腰椎神经根病,由同一机构的两名经验丰富的外科医生进行评估和手术。最终结果由一名公正的第三方使用相同的标准,通过患者自我评估表进行客观判定。该研究考察了治疗过程的各个相关方面以及最终结果。显微外科组的结果明显更好:探查的节段更少;术中失血量更少,深静脉血栓形成、尿路感染、肺栓塞和膀胱插管的发生率降低;完全行走、出院和重返工作岗位的时间更快;职业变更减少,客观和主观测量的最终满意结果百分比更高。本文介绍了本研究中使用的显微外科技术,该技术与现有的显微椎间盘切除术技术有显著差异。作者得出结论,本研究中提出的显微外科椎间盘切除术技术是治疗腰椎神经根病的一种安全有效的方法。

相似文献

1
The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standard lumbar disc procedure.卡斯帕显微外科椎间盘切除术及其与传统标准腰椎间盘手术的比较。
Neurosurgery. 1991 Jan;28(1):78-86; discussion 86-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199101000-00013.
2
The effect of lumbar disc surgery on postoperative pulmonary function and temperature. A comparison study of microsurgical lumbar discectomy with standard lumbar discectomy.腰椎间盘手术对术后肺功能和体温的影响。显微外科腰椎间盘切除术与标准腰椎间盘切除术的比较研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Feb;18(2):287-90. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199302000-00019.
3
Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485 patients.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1986;81(1-2):45-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01456264.
4
"Standard" microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. "conservative" microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study.“标准”显微外科腰椎间盘切除术与“保守”显微外科椎间盘切除术:一项初步研究
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;112(1-2):62-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01402455.
5
Advantages of a Microsurgical Translaminar Approach (Keyhole Laminotomy) for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation.显微外科经椎板入路(锁孔椎板切开术)治疗上腰椎间盘突出症的优势
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e16-e22. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
6
Microsurgery versus standard removal of the herniated lumbar disc. A 3-year comparison in 150 cases.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1990 Oct;61(5):399-403. doi: 10.3109/17453679008993549.
7
Comparison of Biochemical Markers of Muscle Damage and Inflammatory Response Between the Open Discectomy, Microsurgical Discectomy, and Microsurgical Discectomy Using Tubular Retractor.开放式椎间盘切除术、显微外科椎间盘切除术和使用管状牵开器的显微外科椎间盘切除术之间肌肉损伤和炎症反应的生化标志物比较
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015 Sep;76(5):384-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393929. Epub 2015 May 29.
8
Microsurgical and standard removal of the protruded lumbar disc: a comparative study.
Neurosurgery. 1981 Apr;8(4):422-7. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198104000-00003.
9
Experience of microsurgical compared with conventional technique in lumbar disc operations.腰椎间盘手术中显微外科技术与传统技术的比较经验
Acta Neurol Scand. 1987 Aug;76(2):129-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1987.tb03556.x.
10
Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: a personal series of 300 patients with at least 1 year of follow-up.显微外科腰椎间盘切除术:300例患者的个人系列病例,随访至少1年。
Microsurgery. 1986;7(2):55-62. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920070202.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Microdiscectomy, Interspinous Device Implantation, and Full-Endoscopic Discectomy for Simple Lumbar Disc Herniation.单纯腰椎间盘突出症的显微椎间盘切除术、棘突间装置植入术和全内镜下椎间盘切除术的临床疗效比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 13;14(6):1925. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061925.
2
Arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal ligament flavum sparing bone anchoring annular suture technique for lumbar disc herniation: A case report and literature review.关节镜辅助单通道黄韧带保留骨锚固环形缝合技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:病例报告及文献复习。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 27;103(39):e39763. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039763.
3
Robotics in Arthroplasty: Historical Progression, Contemporary Applications, and Future Horizons With Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration.
关节置换术中的机器人技术:历史发展、当代应用以及与人工智能(AI)融合的未来展望
Cureus. 2024 Aug 23;16(8):e67611. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67611. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy with two-segment foraminoplasty for the treatment of very highly migrated lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective analysis.经椎间孔腰椎内镜下双节段椎管扩大成形术治疗高度游离型腰椎间盘突出症:回顾性分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 Apr 16;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02379-2.
5
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy vs Standard Discectomy: A Noninferiority Study on Clinically Relevant Changes.全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与标准椎间盘切除术:关于临床相关变化的非劣效性研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):364-369. doi: 10.14444/8458. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
6
Clinical evaluation of paraspinal mini-tubular technique vs. laminoplasty for spinal intradural extramedullary tumors: Study protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.椎旁微管状技术与椎板成形术治疗脊髓髓外硬膜下肿瘤的临床评估:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 5;9:1053885. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1053885. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol.比较微创双通道内镜脊柱手术与传统显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症的疗效和安全性(ENDO-BH 试验):一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照等效试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Feb 22;23(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06094-2.
8
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Basic Concepts and Technical Keys to Clinical Success.经椎间孔内镜下腰椎间盘切除术:临床成功的基本概念和技术要点
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;15(suppl 3):S38-S46. doi: 10.14444/8162.
9
Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Visualized Foraminoplasty and Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation.全内窥镜可视化椎管成形术与椎间盘切除术和小切口椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb;14(2):280-289. doi: 10.1111/os.13087. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
10
Microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for the treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation: report of the surgical technique, patient selection, and clinical outcomes.显微镜下单层外侧块切除术(MELS)治疗隐性区腰椎间盘突出症:手术技术、患者选择和临床结果报告。
BMC Surg. 2021 May 22;21(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01255-7.