Swiergiel Artur H, Zhou Yueping, Dunn Adrian J
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neuroscience, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, P.O. Box 33932, Shreveport, LA 71130-3932, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Nov 2;183(2):178-87. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.06.006. Epub 2007 Jun 17.
The effects of chronic footshock (CFS) or chronic restraint (CRS) on the behavioral responses to acute footshock and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) were studied. Male rats were subjected to either footshock or restraint daily, or left undisturbed (Quiet). After 7 or 14 days treatment, they were placed in an unfamiliar footshock chamber and three footshocks administered at 20s intervals and subsequent freezing and ultrasonic vocalizations (USV's) were recorded. Context-conditioned freezing and USV's were recorded when rats were replaced in the chamber in which they had received the three footshocks. Prior CFS treatment decreased acute footshock-induced freezing and USV's, whereas it increased conditioned freezing and slightly increased conditioned USV's. CRS did not affect footshock-induced freezing, but in contrast to CFS, strongly increased USV's. Intracerebroventricular CRF (30 or 100ng) alone did not elicit freezing in either Quiet or CFS rats, nor did it have any effect on shock-induced freezing in either group. However, CRF increased conditioned freezing in Quiet, but not in CFS rats. CRF alone did not trigger USV's, but slightly increased shock-induced USV's in both Quiet and CFS rats, and significantly increased conditioned USV's in CFS rats. In the forced swim test (FST), chronic footshock did not induce consistent effects, although there was a trend to increased immobility. However, CRF increased immobility. In striking contrast to CFS, chronic restraint consistently decreased immobility. It is concluded that chronic stress has lasting effects on defensive responses. However, not all chronic stress procedures exert the same effects and thus different forms of stress may activate different neural mechanisms. The fact that CFS diminished shock-induced freezing and the effects of CRF on conditioned freezing suggests that CFS desensitizes the brain to CRF. On the other hand, the enhancement of conditioned freezing by CFS, and of conditioned USV's by CRF in CFS rats, indicates more complex effects.
研究了慢性足部电击(CFS)或慢性束缚(CRS)对急性足部电击行为反应和促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子(CRF)的影响。雄性大鼠每天接受足部电击或束缚,或不做处理(安静组)。经过7天或14天的处理后,将它们置于一个陌生的足部电击箱中,每隔20秒施加三次足部电击,并记录随后的僵住行为和超声波发声(USV)。当大鼠被放回接受过三次足部电击的箱子时,记录情境条件性僵住行为和USV。先前的CFS处理减少了急性足部电击诱导的僵住行为和USV,而增加了条件性僵住行为,并略微增加了条件性USV。CRS不影响足部电击诱导的僵住行为,但与CFS相反,强烈增加了USV。脑室内注射CRF(30或100纳克)单独在安静组或CFS大鼠中均未引发僵住行为,对两组的电击诱导僵住行为也没有任何影响。然而,CRF增加了安静组的条件性僵住行为,但在CFS大鼠中没有。单独的CRF不会引发USV,但在安静组和CFS大鼠中略微增加了电击诱导的USV,并显著增加了CFS大鼠的条件性USV。在强迫游泳试验(FST)中,慢性足部电击没有产生一致的影响,尽管有不动时间增加的趋势。然而,CRF增加了不动时间。与CFS形成鲜明对比的是,慢性束缚持续减少了不动时间。得出的结论是,慢性应激对防御反应有持久影响。然而,并非所有慢性应激程序都产生相同的效果,因此不同形式的应激可能激活不同的神经机制。CFS减少电击诱导的僵住行为以及CRF对条件性僵住行为的影响这一事实表明,CFS使大脑对CRF脱敏。另一方面,CFS对条件性僵住行为的增强以及CRF对CFS大鼠条件性USV的增强表明了更复杂的影响。