Underhill Kristen, Montgomery Paul, Operario Don
Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2ER.
BMJ. 2007 Aug 4;335(7613):248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39245.446586.BE. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of sexual abstinence only programmes for HIV prevention among participants in high income countries. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: 30 electronic databases without linguistic or geographical restrictions to February 2007, contacts with experts, hand searching, and cross referencing. REVIEW METHODS: Two reviewers independently applied inclusion criteria and extracted data, resolving disagreements by consensus and referral to a third reviewer. Randomised and quasirandomised controlled trials of abstinence only programmes in any high income country were included. Programmes aimed to prevent HIV only or both pregnancy and HIV. Trials evaluated biological outcomes (incidence of HIV, sexually transmitted infection, pregnancy) or behavioural outcomes (incidence or frequency of unprotected vaginal, anal, or oral sex; incidence or frequency of any vaginal, anal, or oral sex; number of partners; condom use; sexual initiation). RESULTS: The search identified 13 trials enrolling about 15,940 US youths. All outcomes were self reported. Compared with various controls, no programme affected incidence of unprotected vaginal sex, number of partners, condom use, or sexual initiation. One trial observed adverse effects at short term follow-up (sexually transmitted infections, frequency of sex) and long term follow-up (sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy) compared with usual care, but findings were offset by trials with non-significant results. Another trial observed a protective effect on incidence of vaginal sex compared with usual care, but this was limited to short term follow-up and countered by trials with non-significant findings. Heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Programmes that exclusively encourage abstinence from sex do not seem to affect the risk of HIV infection in high income countries, as measured by self reported biological and behavioural outcomes.
目的:评估高收入国家参与者中仅禁欲预防艾滋病病毒(HIV)项目的效果。 设计:系统评价。 数据来源:截至2007年2月的30个无语言或地域限制的电子数据库、与专家联系、手工检索及交叉引用。 综述方法:两名综述员独立应用纳入标准并提取数据,通过共识解决分歧,并在需要时咨询第三位综述员。纳入任何高收入国家仅禁欲项目的随机和半随机对照试验。这些项目旨在仅预防HIV或同时预防妊娠和HIV。试验评估生物学结局(HIV感染率、性传播感染、妊娠)或行为学结局(无保护阴道、肛门或口交的发生率或频率;任何阴道、肛门或口交的发生率或频率;性伴侣数量;避孕套使用情况;首次性行为)。 结果:检索确定了13项试验,纳入约15940名美国青年。所有结局均为自我报告。与各种对照相比,没有项目影响无保护阴道性行为的发生率、性伴侣数量、避孕套使用情况或首次性行为。一项试验观察到与常规护理相比,在短期随访(性传播感染、性行为频率)和长期随访(性传播感染、妊娠)时有不良影响,但结果被无显著结果的试验所抵消。另一项试验观察到与常规护理相比,对阴道性行为发生率有保护作用,但仅限于短期随访,且被无显著结果的试验所反驳。异质性妨碍了荟萃分析。 结论:仅鼓励禁欲的项目似乎不会影响高收入国家HIV感染风险,这是根据自我报告的生物学和行为学结局来衡量的。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-10-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-1-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-1-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-1-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-9-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2023-2-22
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-11-22
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022-2-22
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-8-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-10-17
Am J Public Health. 2006-6
Lancet. 2006-4-15
PLoS Med. 2005-5
Science. 2004-8-27