Khalequzzaman M, Kamijima M, Sakai K, Chowdhury N A, Hamajima N, Nakajima T
Department of Medical Administration, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Indoor Air. 2007 Aug;17(4):297-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00477.x.
Indoor air concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and dust particles were measured for 49 biomass and 46 fossil fuel users in urban slums of Dhaka, Bangladesh. The health impacts of these pollutants were assessed on 65 and 51 children under five years old from families who use biomass and fossil fuel as main source of energy, respectively. Mean concentrations of CO were found to be significantly higher in biomass fuel users (P = 0.010), while geometric mean concentrations of benzene, xylene, toluene, hexane, total VOCs, and NO2 were significantly higher (P < 0.01) in the fossil fuel users. Symptoms such as redness of eyes, itching of skin, nasal discharge, cough, shortness of breath, chest tightness, wheezing, or whistling chest were found to be associated with the choice of biomass fuel, with the odds ratio ranging from 4.0 to 6.3. No significant association of use of biomass fuel with respiratory diseases, eczema, diarrhea, or viral fever was observed after adjustment for potential confounders. These results suggest a significant association between the biomass fuel-using population and respiratory symptoms. These symptoms may not be due to the pollutants only, as some other underlying causes may be present.
The health of children under five years old in Bangladesh, especially those living in poor socioeconomic conditions, is considered to be worsening because of indoor air pollution. It is commonly suggested that biomass fuel should be replaced by fossil fuel, as pollution levels are believed to be higher with biomass fuel. Our findings, however, suggest that pollution can be higher with fossil fuels, and indicate that a switch in fuel from biomass to fossil does not necessarily improve the children's health. Awareness programs should therefore be undertaken to avoid the unnecessary use of gas. Clean fuels and clean stoves should also be ensured to reduce emissions of indoor air pollutants.
对孟加拉国达卡市城市贫民窟的49名使用生物质燃料者和46名使用化石燃料者的室内空气中挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)、一氧化碳(CO)、二氧化碳(CO₂)、二氧化氮(NO₂)及灰尘颗粒浓度进行了测量。分别对以生物质燃料和化石燃料为主要能源家庭中的65名和51名五岁以下儿童的健康影响进行了评估。结果发现,生物质燃料使用者的CO平均浓度显著更高(P = 0.010),而化石燃料使用者的苯、二甲苯、甲苯、己烷、总挥发性有机化合物及NO₂的几何平均浓度显著更高(P < 0.01)。眼睛发红、皮肤瘙痒、流鼻涕、咳嗽、呼吸急促、胸闷、喘息或胸部有哮鸣声等症状与生物质燃料的选择有关,优势比在4.0至6.3之间。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,未观察到使用生物质燃料与呼吸道疾病、湿疹、腹泻或病毒性发热之间存在显著关联。这些结果表明,使用生物质燃料人群与呼吸道症状之间存在显著关联。这些症状可能并非仅由污染物导致,因为可能存在其他一些潜在原因。
由于室内空气污染,孟加拉国五岁以下儿童的健康状况,尤其是生活在社会经济条件差地区的儿童健康状况,被认为正在恶化。人们普遍建议用化石燃料替代生物质燃料,因为据信生物质燃料的污染水平更高。然而,我们的研究结果表明,化石燃料的污染可能更高,这表明从生物质燃料转换为化石燃料不一定能改善儿童健康。因此,应开展宣传项目以避免不必要地使用燃气。还应确保使用清洁燃料和清洁炉灶,以减少室内空气污染物排放。