Hayes Donald K, Lukacs Susan L, Schoendorf Kenneth C
Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, MS K22, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2008 Sep;12(5):549-56. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0270-8. Epub 2007 Aug 12.
Birthweight distributions and proportions of low birthweight (LBW) are commonly used to assess the health of populations. However, the "population" is difficult to define due to differences by race, socioeconomic status, age distribution, and cultural identity. This study analyzes birth outcomes in two Asian subgroups to examine variation within the Asian population.
Analysis of the 1998-2003 National Center for Health Statistics' natality file for 293,211 singleton births in Asian Indian and Chinese mothers compared birthweight distributions, mean birthweights, proportions of very low birthweight (VLBW) and moderately low birthweight (MLBW) infants, and the influence of maternal nativity on these outcomes. A multiple logistic regression analysis, stratified by maternal nativity, was done to control for established confounders of maternal age, marital status, education, and parity.
Maternal characteristics and birthweight distributions varied by race subgroup and nativity. Infants of Asian Indian mothers had a lower mean birthweight and higher proportions of VLBW and MLBW than Chinese. After controlling for differences in maternal characteristics, infants of US born Asian Indian mothers were more likely to be VLBW (AOR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.27-2.75) or MLBW (AOR 1.59, 1.39-1.82) than infants of US born Chinese mothers. Similarly, infants of non-US born Asian Indian mothers were more likely to be VLBW (AOR 2.13, 2.06-2.21) or MLBW (AOR 2.26, 2.18-2.35) then infants of non-US born Chinese mothers.
Our study demonstrates variation in birth outcomes by maternal race and nativity in two Asian subgroups. The heterogeneity within a single commonly used "population" is likely not limited to these two Asian subgroups, but is probably applicable to many populations in the United States. Analyses should try to account for these differences to ensure a more accurate representation of various populations in the US. The difficulty of defining a population by race adds to the complexity of examining disparities in birth outcomes.
出生体重分布及低出生体重(LBW)比例常用于评估人群健康状况。然而,由于种族、社会经济地位、年龄分布及文化身份的差异,“人群”难以界定。本研究分析了两个亚洲亚组的出生结局,以考察亚洲人群内部的差异。
对1998 - 2003年美国国家卫生统计中心的出生记录文件进行分析,该文件包含293,211例亚洲印度裔和华裔母亲的单胎分娩信息,比较了出生体重分布、平均出生体重、极低出生体重(VLBW)和中度低出生体重(MLBW)婴儿的比例,以及母亲出生地对这些结局的影响。进行了一项按母亲出生地分层的多因素逻辑回归分析,以控制母亲年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度和产次等既定混杂因素。
母亲特征和出生体重分布因种族亚组和出生地而异。亚洲印度裔母亲的婴儿平均出生体重较低,VLBW和MLBW比例高于华裔母亲。在控制了母亲特征的差异后,美国出生的亚洲印度裔母亲的婴儿比美国出生的华裔母亲的婴儿更有可能是VLBW(优势比[AOR] 1.87,95%置信区间[CI]:1.27 - 2.75)或MLBW(AOR 1.59,1.39 - 1.82)。同样,非美国出生的亚洲印度裔母亲的婴儿比非美国出生的华裔母亲的婴儿更有可能是VLBW(AOR 2.13,2.06 - 2.21)或MLBW(AOR 2.26,2.18 - 2.35)。
我们的研究表明,两个亚洲亚组中母亲种族和出生地对出生结局存在差异。单一常用“人群”内部的异质性可能不仅限于这两个亚洲亚组,可能适用于美国的许多人群。分析应考虑这些差异,以确保更准确地反映美国不同人群的情况。按种族界定人群的困难增加了研究出生结局差异的复杂性。